Enforce the laws on the books
The Grassley Cruz bill does that. Though it should be done already.
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
February 26th, 2018 at 8:24 pm
We need laws that require the enforcement of laws? Hah! That’s just our legislators being hypocrites (as if they needed to go out of their way prove it to us).
Nothing to see here. If the first law is being ignored, then logic tells us that any subsequent law can be as readily ignored, or ignored with even more totality because of the precedent having already been set. And…Congress passed a law approving a border wall many years ago too. So what? Obama even said it was completed, and we’re still arguing about a wall.
And then there is that “Supreme Law of the Land” which is being ignored all along, virtually all subsequent laws being either redundant to or opposed to it. So what?
So we had a Bill of Rights, to which all politicians must swear an Oath, and which was being ignored, and so now we have 18 USC 241 and 18 USC 242 to enforce the enforcement of the protection of rights, and those are being ignored, and…lather, rinse, repeat.
Nothing so see here.
Thesis, antithesis, synthesis. All of politics, finance and religion works within that style of manipulation based on deception, which is the deception-of-the-false-choice-followed-by-the-compromise. The compromise is more government or other centralized influence. “This has gone on too long (but they set it up and ran it), and so we have to act…” And whenever that deception fails, they use intimidation including de-stabilization, increased violence on the streets, murder and threats of murder. In the final analysis it is a system of murder and plunder, modeled like to any successful organized crime system, but more surreptitious and more deeply entrenched. It always works because no one wants to believe that it’s as evil as it is. We either fall for the selling points (all lies), latch onto one of the false choices (“Hurray for our team; fuck those other guys!”), or we are sufficiently intimidated, or we’re seduced into being part of it, or all of the above. Silver or lead. So what’s your point?
February 26th, 2018 at 8:33 pm
All 20,000 of them?
Be careful what you wish for. The main reason the government is just barely tolerable is that it is so inefficient at enforcing the laws and regulations already on the books.
Also remember that every day another 200 or so pages of laws/regulations are published in the Federal Register. Have you read today’s new batch to see what it means to you? Of course not. The reality is that not a single human being knows what all the US laws are. Ayn Rand has told us why this is just what the bad guys want.
February 27th, 2018 at 3:51 am
What he said. What point is a law saying enforce the existing law? Is that like double-secret probation?