Ammo For Sale

« « A poll on why Americans are buying more guns | Home | In TN » »

Only the police should have guns

SF deputy discharges his gun in the office.

6 Responses to “Only the police should have guns”

  1. John Says:

    I remember my first desk pop.

  2. Nolan Says:

    They kept referring to the gun as a “baby glock”, so I thought this was the new small one, but then they claimed it was a .22 caliber… Is that the 40 S&W, or could this just be some other gun and the media can’t be bothered to do a 2 second google search?

  3. Shrimp Says:

    “…could this just be some other gun and the media can’t be bothered to do a 2 second google search?”

    Yes.

    Just like every semi-auto carbine is either an AK47 or an M16, you know every handgun is a “Glock,” so therefore any smaller handgun would be a “baby Glock.” Caliber is to be referred to by both standard and metric (i.e. .22mm), or if unknown, make one up.

    Facts–Who needs ’em when you can control the narrative?

  4. Ferret Says:

    Meanwhile, at the Hall of Justice…

    What the f…??!?!

    The language used in the article stands out from your usual “negligent discharge by law enforcement” article.

    Phrases were used such as, “…pulled the trigger…” and “…accidentally fired it…” instead of “the gun discharged” or “the gun fired”.

  5. Huck Says:

    “The second deputy pointed the weapon at the first deputy and – apparently unaware the weapon was loaded – pulled the trigger.”

    TWO major fails in one paragraph.

  6. SD3 Says:

    Chicks with dicks, man. Chicks with dicks.

Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.

Uncle Pays the Bills

Find Local
Gun Shops & Shooting Ranges


bisonAd

Categories

Archives