Ammo For Sale

« « Custom CNC’d Folding-Fin 12 ga “Missile” Round | Home | Gun Porn » »

A right made up

The Right to be Free From Guns

24 Responses to “A right made up”

  1. j t bolt Says:

    and filled with lies

  2. Raptor Says:

    Or those morons could grow a pair of balls. Just sayin’.

  3. SPM Says:

    A right to be free of idiots.

  4. Mike V. Says:

    When I read “the best path to better laws is to foster a revolution in popular attitudes”, I laughed so hard I had tea coming out my nose.

  5. Shootin' Buddy Says:

    We need a law to force them to own guns, just like they made a law to force people to buy insurance.

  6. Ellen Says:

    We need a list of people who’ve protected themselves or others through the use of tobacco. Then we can do a better job of comparing costs and benefits.

  7. Heath J Says:

    Yawn.

    A “right” for everything these days. People don’t value the rights they’re guaranteed by the Constitution, why make up fake ones?

  8. Deaf Smith Says:

    By inference we have a right to be free of knives, clubs, big sticks, rocks, groups of young thugs, tanks, cannons, atom bombs, rockets, …. illegal aliens, robbers, murders, thieves, kidnappers, etc…

    Right E.J.?

    So how you gonna enforce the right to be free of guns? Have cops use guns? Kind of circular logic.

  9. TS Says:

    As yes, the right to be free from guns. It’s right there in the bizarro bill of rights after the right to shut people up.

  10. Ron W Says:

    “The right NOT to bear (carry) arms” ? You already have that. Just waive the right and don’t carry. It’s called pro-choice. And you can deny that right or any right on YOUR property.

  11. nk Says:

    We can find gun-free zones for them, where they’ll never even hear a gun unless they try to climb over the fence.

  12. comatus Says:

    Wilsonian progressives forcibly asserted a right to be free of Negroes. A “social hygiene” thing. This being an era of racial healing and all, I’m discomfited at how often I have to remind progressives of that.

  13. Ron W Says:

    There are already plenty of gun free zones where mass murderers can operate with impunity–as they have done in the other shootings.

  14. Ron W Says:

    The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. – 9th Amendment, Bill of Rights

    Declaring additional rights is OK because rights are something you exercise by and for yourself, NOT something restricted or denied to others. There is NO right to be free from others exercising their rights, other than by your right to remove yourself from the “offensive” activity.

  15. Ron W Says:

    A “made up right” is fine as long as…

    “Of liberty I would say that, in the whole plenitude of its extent, it is unobstructed action according to our will. But rightful liberty is unobstructed action according to our will within limits drawn around us by the equal rights of others. I do not add ‘within the limits of the law,’ because law is often but the tyrant’s will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual.” –Thomas Jefferson to Isaac H. Tiffany, 1819.

  16. Lyle Says:

    I actually do have the right to be free from any and all Progressives or other collectivists/authoritarians, or at least from any and all of their coercive laws and policies. THAT actually is in the constitution.

    Our founding principles are all being turned upside-down of course, and it’s only “fair” in the eyes of the authoritarian. WE have enjoyed protection from THEM for a long time, and now it’s only “fair” that THEY receive protection from OUR demands for liberty.

    This Progressive insanity started officially in the U.S. around the year 1900, and was going in ernest by 1913.

    If our grandparents and great grandparents didn’t have the wherewithall to do anything about it, then the question “What are WE going to do about?” comes to mind.

    What do we have that they didn’t have, that will allow us to overcome what they could not, or would not, overcome?

    Hmm? Anyone?

  17. Beaumont Says:

    Their right to be free from guns, which they will want to be enforced by people with guns. All the Left’s “rights” require depriving other people of their rights.

  18. Lyle Says:

    “All the Left’s “rights” require depriving other people of their rights.”

    Exactly, and this goes all the way back to the beginnings of the Progressive era. Actually a lot farther back than that. The “Second Bill of Rights” proposed by FDR is but one example;

    “Employment, with a living wage

    Food, clothing and leisure

    Farmers’ rights to fair income

    Freedom from (and there it is; “freedom from”) unfair competition and monopolies

    Housing

    Medical care

    Social Security

    Education”

    Each and every one of those requires some form of largess be coercively extracted by the government from some people and handed over to someone else.

    Obama’s use of the term “Charter of Negative Rights” is of the same mindset. He was complaining that the original Bill of Rights only says what government can’t do to you, and so you see; they view liberty as shackle of oppression– It means they don’t get to do the things they want to do.

    I’ve said it before; both sides see themselves as would-be liberators. They also see the other side as criminally insane, when it comes right down to it. That doesn’t mean they’re both right though, of course.

    One side want “freedom” from what is right so they can do wrong, and other wants freedom from wrong, to do right.

    That’s the conflict, in its purest from, though of course there are many people distributed somewhere in between, sitting in confusion, being distracted by all the silly assertions, lies, half truths, accusations, cat-calling and general stupidity.
    I call it the Battle of the Two Alliances, for there are only two. Choose one, and understand it.

  19. Crawler Says:

    I find it absolutely amazing that E.J still has a freakin’ job. With about a few hundred readers who actually buy into his bovine scat, I guess the WAPO has an acceptable loss policy.

    There are more head-shaking and LOL lines in that drivel posing as journalistic opinion than even E.J. himself could shake someone’s di…stick at.

  20. ChuckinHouston Says:

    I believe in the “right to be free from guns.” I believe it is an individual right. If you don’t won’t a gun don’t buy one! Some people choose not to exercise their right to vote; others ignore their right to free speech. It should be the same with guns.

  21. Ron W Says:

    But Chuck, you’re talking about liberty. And there is a paranoia regarding it both among the ruled and especially, the elite ruling class.

    “Timid men prefer the calm of despotism to the tempestuous sea of liberty.” –Thomas Jefferson

  22. Kristophr Says:

    So leftists are demanding a right to be time-travelled back into the 13th Century?

    I’m somehow OK with this.

  23. Richard Says:

    “So leftists are demanding a right to be time-travelled back into the 13th Century?

    I’m somehow OK with this.”

    Sending them to Pluto would be OK too.

  24. Huck Says:

    The “right to be free of guns” is in the same category as the so-called right to not be offended and the so-called right to a free living at the expense of the working folks.

    I’ve many times heard libscum squeal that those last 2 are indeed “rights.”

Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.

Uncle Pays the Bills

Find Local
Gun Shops & Shooting Ranges


bisonAd

Categories

Archives