If it weren’t for double standards, they’d have no standards
3 Responses to “If it weren’t for double standards, they’d have no standards”
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
March 31st, 2015 at 8:39 pm
If there is a positive aspect to horrible, evil bastards, it is that they so often reveal themselves to be fools, paniced cowards, hypocrites, etc.
One might go so far as to call it the mark of the beast, but apparently only certain people can see it, or possibly there are those who see it and are attracted to it, and those who see it and are repulsed.
April 1st, 2015 at 8:04 am
You know… maybe they shouldn’t have used an assasination /attempt/ as their example of the failure of armed security…
Because one coudl argue that without the Secret Service it migth not have been an /attempt/.
Also are they really arguing that the president shouldn’t have Secret Service protection? Good luck selling that argument.
April 1st, 2015 at 11:01 am
How will any of their proposed gun laws be enforced? Oh, by guns, of course!