Ammo For Sale

« « There was a debate | Home | In common use » »

Public servants keep losing “assault rifles”

A firefighter lost one. And a police man did too.

6 Responses to “Public servants keep losing “assault rifles””

  1. Lyle Says:

    Criminals are going to get their guns somewhere. Join a police force and you have plenty of access. Get yourself in charge of inventory and Bob’s your uncle.

    You may not believe my personal exeriences with government employees and various inventories and insruance companies, realitives in government accounting, etc. if I told you, but understand that I have decades of experience to back up that first paragraph. It is a freaking free-for-all in certain quarters. You have no idea unless you’ve seen it, and it is both institutional and cultural, and very well entrenched.

  2. divemedic Says:

    A little unfair to lump a firefighter who lost his own personal rifle while off duty to a cop losing a duty weapon.

  3. Skeptical_Realist Says:

    Huh. First time I’ve heard of guns ACTUALLY being on the streets.

    Successful cases of “getting guns off the streets”:
    Gun “Buybacks” : zero
    Background checks : zero
    Gun Bans : zero
    Good Samaritans with firearms training: Two

    /sarc

  4. Tam Says:

    Don’t you mean “patrol rifles”? I thought they were only “assault rifles” if they were in private hands? 😉

  5. Ron W Says:

    Tam, good point. When DHS purchased 7000 rifles which were probably select-fire, they called them “personal defense rifles”. Of course, WE paid for those rifles and the ones which have been lost. That’s a reason they get lost because their handlers are not owners. Otherwise the term “assault rifle” is a pejorative term used by those who take from others what they keep for themselves.

  6. Roger V. Tranfaglia Says:

    I understand business is good……

Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.

Uncle Pays the Bills

Find Local
Gun Shops & Shooting Ranges


bisonAd

Categories

Archives