Civil asset forfeiture reform
4 Responses to “Civil asset forfeiture reform”
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
January 27th, 2015 at 9:02 pm
No.
No.
NO.
It’s not enough. Forfeiture should require proof beyond a reasonable doubt – because it should require conviction of a crime.
January 27th, 2015 at 11:10 pm
I hear you Jake but it’s a start.
January 28th, 2015 at 8:49 am
You would think this unnecessary in a country with a Fifth Amendment.
The people who will vote against this in Congress and the guy who would veto it if it did pass hate the whole Constitution and the entire Bill of Rights.
January 28th, 2015 at 2:34 pm
I don’t like forfeiture without fair compesnation, period.
I don’t care what the forfeited asset was used for.
Or where it goes after its forfeiture.
We don’t need laws which incentive law enforcement to do its job.
I am pro-law enforcement, but I am also pro-Constitution.