Self-Defense Is Not Vigilantism
Scolding the NYT, a paper that gets substantially everything wrong about gun issues.
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
February 26th, 2014 at 8:43 am
I would be highly surprised if the gun banner types could understand what the article says, quite frankly.
I myself have never been one to believe in Natural Laws.(If I believed in those; I would have to believe in survival of the stupidest, because when all things are said and done the stupid tend to survive.)
It goes right up there with inalienable rights and war crimes. All of these things do not really exist until we are told they do.
February 26th, 2014 at 2:30 pm
Paul, I disagree. All of these things exist, whether recognized by society or not, and once an individual claims these rights for himself or herself, they are then inalienable and may be infringed but never invalidated, destroyed or nullified.
That is, once recognized, these rights exist forever.
February 26th, 2014 at 10:35 pm
For something that exists when it is recognized it sure took a long time after Locke’s death before his words were fulfilled…