Quote of the day
How Do We Know an ‘Assault Weapon’ Ban Would Not Have Stopped Adam Lanza? Because It Didn’t. I think I’ve hardly seen mention of that fact in the press.
Related, making all guns assault weapons.
2 Responses to “Quote of the day”
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
December 18th, 2012 at 12:38 pm
Let’s not forget that Columbine happened smack in the middle of the ’94-’04 Federal AWB.
Like you say, “Gun Bans: It’s what they do instead of something.”
December 18th, 2012 at 3:07 pm
The time: 1786
The place: A small town in Connecticut
The scene: A one room schoolhouse
The scenario: A madman with a musket and bayonet, the “assault weapon” of its day, enters. The alarum is raised.
The unarmed teachers bravely try to rush the killer but are met with ball and blade, the killer methodically reloads and fires, 3-4 rounds a minute, firing 50 shots before the armed constabulary arrive 20 minutes later and he takes his own life.
Town criers and post riders spread the terrible news, the next days begin a time of mourning.
Does anyone think the “national conversation” among those people would include “reexamining the proposed 2nd Amendment?”