Gunrunning: Not just for ATF any more
Remember, I do this to entertain me, not you.
Uncle Pays the Bills
 |
|
Find Local
|
Categories
- ATF (769)
- Death Match (10)
- Eminent Domain (225)
- In the bag (9)
- Notes to Junior (546)
- Poker (74)
- Recipes (142)
- Shotgun Noob (11)
- The Airing of Grievances (19)
- uncategorized (47,725)
July 22nd, 2011 at 3:35 pm
You mean hitlery’s DoS? But, but… she supports the UN arms treaty! Tell me this is all a lie! It’s so confusing!
July 22nd, 2011 at 3:38 pm
So, besides me, who wasn’t getting guns from assorted government agencies?
July 22nd, 2011 at 4:03 pm
Just think of it as CMP for international drug gangs and general criminal organizations.
July 22nd, 2011 at 5:34 pm
That must be why Obama blocked the return of Korean Garands and M1 Carbines, they said they could “be smuggled to terrorists, gangs or other people with bad intentions”. “Worried” is not the word they meant, they wanted and intended to send them to South American gangs and terrorists. THEY are the people with bad intent.
July 22nd, 2011 at 6:23 pm
http://hotair.com/archives/2011/07/22/will-gunwalker-morph-into-grenadewalker-soon/
July 22nd, 2011 at 8:55 pm
I ‘said’ we hadn’t seen the bottom of the barrel yet… sigh…
July 23rd, 2011 at 8:51 am
I guess Hillary wasn’t about to be outdone by a mere man like Holder.
When both Holder and Clinton are smuggling guns to criminals, the only person who could be behind both of them is their boss Obama. If DoJ and DoS were both running guns, then it was de facto Obama administration policy to do so, and the President has to take responsibility for it, which means resignation or impeachment.
July 23rd, 2011 at 6:15 pm
When does the Department of Education start selling? kids need school funding!
July 23rd, 2011 at 10:22 pm
Billary has been in this up to her bloodshot eyeballs since it started. Who cried the loudest about guns from the U.S. going to Mexico? She belleyached this lie from the beginning. Obongo & others in congress are the enablers of this treasonous criminal conspiracy. Billary, the head? cheerleader.
July 24th, 2011 at 10:11 am
As some Democrat said during Watergate about Nixon, I say the same about the current Secretary Of State: “WHAT did MRS. CLINTON know, and WHEN did She know it?”
July 24th, 2011 at 10:31 am
As explosive as this new portion of the story is, has anyone else noticed that it received no major media coverage.
Until it’s picked up by print or television I do wonder if there will be any ramifications for something that would surely bring down a republican administration, if the situation is reversed.
And if a republican administration did such a thing I would support their coming down as well. No American government should sell weapons, military or civilian to crooks and terrorists.
Other than to Saudi Arabia of course.
July 24th, 2011 at 1:53 pm
“When does the Department of Education start selling?”
What ever did happen to all those short-barrelled shotguns that the Department of Education purchased not too long ago? Where are they now? Guarding some Mexican drug lord?
July 25th, 2011 at 8:52 am
Bubblehead,
I believe that famous question, “what did he know and when did he know it”, came from Sen. Howard Baker, R-TN. But it’s a good one.
This is a far greater crime than what occurred in Watergate. This is “giving aid and comfort to the enemies” which is defined as “treason” in Article III, Section 3 of the Constitution. And we know that from Sec of St. Clinton’s previous statements and those of Atty Gen Holder, that the probable pretext is to prove their assertion that the 2nd Amendment rights of American citizens is to blame for Mexican drug cartel violence, now spilling over our southern border which remains largely undefended; a refusal of our government to “protect the States against invasion” according to its duty in Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution.
It seems to me we have a lawless government which is at war with its people.