http://www.saysuncle.com/2010/01/25/ten-more/ Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:57:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://www.saysuncle.com/2010/01/25/ten-more/comment-page-1/#comment-237645 CMathews Mon, 25 Jan 2010 21:35:15 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=33304#comment-237645 the comments at Military Times state these would be good for usage in the IAR's, while I do agree with this statement, I see a problem. Wasn't one of the reasons for the IAR is that a sustained fire weapon could be brought into a squad without the IAR carrier standing out as much as a SAW carrier? If so, this would be a dead give away to any competent sniper Hadji may have (I know its a stretch). Just my .02. Magpul has had the 48 round extensions for a while, why is this just now getting a nod? the comments at Military Times state these would be good for usage in the IAR’s, while I do agree with this statement, I see a problem. Wasn’t one of the reasons for the IAR is that a sustained fire weapon could be brought into a squad without the IAR carrier standing out as much as a SAW carrier? If so, this would be a dead give away to any competent sniper Hadji may have (I know its a stretch). Just my .02. Magpul has had the 48 round extensions for a while, why is this just now getting a nod?

]]>