<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mounting problems</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2009/07/20/mounting-problems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2009/07/20/mounting-problems/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:05:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2009/07/20/mounting-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-225045</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=27322#comment-225045</guid>
		<description>I am currently waiting on a the return of the paperwork on my Yankee Hill can.  Last week I picked up my 2 AR uppers after the gunsmith had installed the QD flash hiders.  Apparently these are the ones the BATF has the problem with. So do I now have two ARs that need to be registered? I think not but will they see it differently.  This is the problem with BATF making up the rules as they go.  It is hard to hit a missing target and they know it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am currently waiting on a the return of the paperwork on my Yankee Hill can.  Last week I picked up my 2 AR uppers after the gunsmith had installed the QD flash hiders.  Apparently these are the ones the BATF has the problem with. So do I now have two ARs that need to be registered? I think not but will they see it differently.  This is the problem with BATF making up the rules as they go.  It is hard to hit a missing target and they know it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim W</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2009/07/20/mounting-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-225027</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=27322#comment-225027</guid>
		<description>Just theorizing here, but I think it depends on the design of the mount and whether it&#039;s part of the suppressor or the rifle. 

For example, if the &quot;mount&quot; holds the baffles into the gun, that might reasonably be considered a &quot;part of a silencer.&quot; Pretty much anything that prevents the suppressor from falling apart (on a take-down type suppressor) should reasonably be expected to be considered part of the suppressor, unless the suppressor functions as a pile of unassembled parts. 

Then again, I can easily think of several designs for reflex type suppressors (ie, a front mounting point and a rear mounting point behind the muzzle that seals the back of the can) where screwing the tube on over the barrel could hold the baffles in place- would that make the barrel itself a &quot;silencer part&quot; even if it were just an ordinary threaded barrel? 

I would love to find out more details about this ruling and where it came from, assuming this whole story is true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just theorizing here, but I think it depends on the design of the mount and whether it&#8217;s part of the suppressor or the rifle. </p>
<p>For example, if the &#8220;mount&#8221; holds the baffles into the gun, that might reasonably be considered a &#8220;part of a silencer.&#8221; Pretty much anything that prevents the suppressor from falling apart (on a take-down type suppressor) should reasonably be expected to be considered part of the suppressor, unless the suppressor functions as a pile of unassembled parts. </p>
<p>Then again, I can easily think of several designs for reflex type suppressors (ie, a front mounting point and a rear mounting point behind the muzzle that seals the back of the can) where screwing the tube on over the barrel could hold the baffles in place- would that make the barrel itself a &#8220;silencer part&#8221; even if it were just an ordinary threaded barrel? </p>
<p>I would love to find out more details about this ruling and where it came from, assuming this whole story is true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2009/07/20/mounting-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-225021</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 18:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=27322#comment-225021</guid>
		<description>Sounds like its just YHM at this point, I&#039;ve got a mount coming from AAC I ordered today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like its just YHM at this point, I&#8217;ve got a mount coming from AAC I ordered today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laughingdog</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2009/07/20/mounting-problems/comment-page-1/#comment-225017</link>
		<dc:creator>Laughingdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 17:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=27322#comment-225017</guid>
		<description>I saw this post in that same thread.

http://www.subguns.com/boards/mgmsg.cgi?read=702199

&quot;Looked that the Cobra that takes multi mounts and you can only buy 1 mount with the suppressor. 

&quot;All Cobra M2 sound suppressors are constructed using Sound Tech’s patented baffle design (U.S. Patent #7,073,426) for superior sound reduction. A mount must be purchased with the suppressor. Additional mounts cannot be purchased at this time.&quot; &quot;


I went to YHM (http://yankeehillmachine.com/store/cobramod.html), and found that to be an accurate statement.  Whether or not that is due to the ATF is not stated on that page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this post in that same thread.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.subguns.com/boards/mgmsg.cgi?read=702199" rel="nofollow">http://www.subguns.com/boards/mgmsg.cgi?read=702199</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Looked that the Cobra that takes multi mounts and you can only buy 1 mount with the suppressor. </p>
<p>&#8220;All Cobra M2 sound suppressors are constructed using Sound Tech’s patented baffle design (U.S. Patent #7,073,426) for superior sound reduction. A mount must be purchased with the suppressor. Additional mounts cannot be purchased at this time.&#8221; &#8221;</p>
<p>I went to YHM (<a href="http://yankeehillmachine.com/store/cobramod.html" rel="nofollow">http://yankeehillmachine.com/store/cobramod.html</a>), and found that to be an accurate statement.  Whether or not that is due to the ATF is not stated on that page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

