<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: extensive legal research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2009/06/18/extensive-legal-research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2009/06/18/extensive-legal-research/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:13:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stormare Mackee</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2009/06/18/extensive-legal-research/comment-page-1/#comment-223458</link>
		<dc:creator>Stormare Mackee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=26428#comment-223458</guid>
		<description>Retard statement of the day:

&lt;i&gt;“The ultimate victory, if it would ever happen, would be for the court to recognize a constitutional right to be free from gun violence, public or private,” Smith said.&lt;/i&gt;

&quot;Constitutional right to be free from gun violence&quot;? And this guy is an attorney? Maybe he should also defend the &quot;constitutional right to not be shot in a robbery&quot; and the &quot;constitutional right to not be a victim of home invasion&quot; and... good grief, which part of TCA 39-17-1359 does he fail to understand?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Retard statement of the day:</p>
<p><i>“The ultimate victory, if it would ever happen, would be for the court to recognize a constitutional right to be free from gun violence, public or private,” Smith said.</i></p>
<p>&#8220;Constitutional right to be free from gun violence&#8221;? And this guy is an attorney? Maybe he should also defend the &#8220;constitutional right to not be shot in a robbery&#8221; and the &#8220;constitutional right to not be a victim of home invasion&#8221; and&#8230; good grief, which part of TCA 39-17-1359 does he fail to understand?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

