<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Layers of editorial oversight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2009/06/04/layers-of-editorial-oversight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2009/06/04/layers-of-editorial-oversight/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:24:32 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sailorcurt</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2009/06/04/layers-of-editorial-oversight/comment-page-1/#comment-222308</link>
		<dc:creator>Sailorcurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 14:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=25728#comment-222308</guid>
		<description>If it had been in the hands of the perpetrator rather than the intended victim, it would have undoubtedly been a &quot;high powered automatic assault weapon&quot;.

I think it was a psychological thing.  It was a long gun.  No denying that fact, so you can&#039;t call it a handgun.  Semi-automatic rifles are bad, are only intended to spray fire from the hip and kill as many people as possible in as short a time as possible and can&#039;t POSSIBLY be used for defensive purposes.

Therefore, the longarm that the shopowner used MUST have been a shotgun.  Media logic dictates that it couldn&#039;t have been anything else.

Thanks for the link.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it had been in the hands of the perpetrator rather than the intended victim, it would have undoubtedly been a &#8220;high powered automatic assault weapon&#8221;.</p>
<p>I think it was a psychological thing.  It was a long gun.  No denying that fact, so you can&#8217;t call it a handgun.  Semi-automatic rifles are bad, are only intended to spray fire from the hip and kill as many people as possible in as short a time as possible and can&#8217;t POSSIBLY be used for defensive purposes.</p>
<p>Therefore, the longarm that the shopowner used MUST have been a shotgun.  Media logic dictates that it couldn&#8217;t have been anything else.</p>
<p>Thanks for the link.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
