Comments on: Court Pick

By: workinwifdakids

workinwifdakids — Wed, 27 May 2009 05:30:43 +0000

Can we start referring to her as the Vajustice?

By: Vote For David

Vote For David — Wed, 27 May 2009 02:53:42 +0000

I wonder how long it will take all of us talking to our co-workers about the blatant racism and sexism in our government, before it stops being politically correct to be racist and sexist?

Oh that makes me a sexist racist doesn’t it? Oops. . .

By: Ron W

Ron W — Tue, 26 May 2009 17:37:50 +0000

If the 2nd Amendment doesn’t apply to the States”(a free state), that means it only applies to the Federal Gov’t and restricts it to only “such part of the part of the militia” that it employees (Article I, Section 9).

That is, Federal gun laws ONLY apply to those employed by the Federal Gov’t and the States and the people are free from those laws. Sounds OK to me.

Somehow, I don’t expect this SCOTUS appt. to think her statement cuts both ways.

By: drstrangegun

drstrangegun — Tue, 26 May 2009 16:25:50 +0000

I just got off scotusblog… I don’t see anything particularly offensive about her previous opinions. Care to enlighten us with some facts? Maybe I’m missing something.

By: Bitter

Bitter — Tue, 26 May 2009 14:33:07 +0000

I’ve got more on the vagina issue. I’ve been collecting key quotes and demands to put together a post on it.

By: chris

chris — Tue, 26 May 2009 13:54:48 +0000

I’m not so sure about the vagina issue.

She kind of reminds me of Janet Reno (sexually ambiguous).

Nonetheless, Obama has picked the worst possible candidate.

This is truly awful if you value the Constitution.

By: Boyd

Boyd — Tue, 26 May 2009 13:15:04 +0000

While I would personally disagree with the ruling in Maloney v Cuomo, I don’t find the reasoning offensive. “We have a precedent. If the SCOTUS wants to overturn it, then they should do so. Until then, we’re bound by it.”

Whodathunk it would have been the 9th Circuit that leads the charge in deviating from that precedent?