Comments on: Holder Calls for new Assault Weapons Ban

By: ali

ali — Mon, 02 Mar 2009 17:31:00 +0000

about damn time. Now make consumption of pot a felony and we’ll finally see mass murdering in Mexico be brought to a halt.

Sad to see close family members have to witness people getting blasted by ak-47′s at a walmart (juarez mex) in mid day, while others are harassed w/death threats for not paying “extortion money

By: Ron W

Ron W — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:23:36 +0000

So the Holder idea is to attack the Bill of Rights and American citizens because of violent crime in Mexico…which is and has been for some time, spilling over the border.

Hey! Do your job! Obey your oath and “protect the States against invasion” (Article IV, Section 4, U.S. Constitution But, just as Bush said, “we can’t militarize the border” and there will be NO “Change” to that policy with Obama . Instead, attack the RKBA of citizens and leave teh boreders undefended.

The reason is in Article III, Section 3 of the Constitution…It’s “treason”.

By: chris

chris — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:57:34 +0000

I don’t like seeing our weaponry go south either, albeit for different reasons.

As you would say, more on Democrats and guns.

By: bob r

bob r — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:56:20 +0000

“You know what else would keep guns out of Mexico?”

I don’t really see it as desirable to keep guns out of Mexico. All that does is give a monopoly on force to the thugs and, at the risk of being repetitious, the government.

If they want to reduce the number of people killed in “drug-related violence”, maybe they should address whatever it is that causes people to be violent about drugs.

By: Jacob

Jacob — Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:53:45 +0000

The Clinton AWB didn’t just sneak in. It took about a year or so of back and forth before it finally passed.