“… and more than 90 percent of weapons in Mexico come from the United States.”
They come from the US because we share a boarder and we actually have the industrial capacity to build them, which Mexico might have if every able bodied, working age person who wasn’t in a criminal gang (and yes, I’m including the federales here) wasn’t working in the US. If guns weren’t legal for sale to civilians, 90% of the guns used by Mexican drug gangs would STILL come from the US.
CNN and the whole of the MSM is composed entirely of idiots. Come to think of it, so is most of their audience and market.
Hey, I thought the CFR politicians said that NAFTA would produce good jobs in Mexico so they wouldn’t come here…that’s what Bush said in the 2004 Presidential debeates answering a question about illegal immigration. But they can’t manufacture guns and ammo?
But saying U.S. guns are going to Mexico which in turn will spill over the border into violence will probably be used as a pretext for the tyrants in Washington to attempt to restrict or deny our RKBA. What about defending our own border instead….no, no, no, “we can’t militarize the border” say the CFR globalists, but oh yes, we can have a militarized BATFE for dealing with armed American citizens….and even the military if need be.
“This Mexican gun canard is now officially dogma. For a reason.” –SayUncle
It doesn’t literally say they bought the bazooka in a gun store. In any event I usually have serious doubts about the MSMs ability to properly identify ordinance so who knows what they were referring to.
It was interesting that the bulk of the article seemed to antiprohibition, (anhibition? inhibition? whatever)