Quote of the day
heh:
deny that the members of the Brady Campaign, if any, will face an increased risk because of the new regulation.
Now that’s funny, right there.
If you knew the ins and outs, you’d know there’s question as to if they even have members.
January 31st, 2009 at 3:35 pm
The Brady Campaign/Center has no membership – they’re a top down, astroturf organization that solicits contributions, but couldn’t care less what anyone else thinks. They’ll do your thinking for you; just send in the money – they aren’t a democracy like the NRA.
They aren’t “fighting to prevent gun violence”; they’re doing everything they can to disarm law-abiding, private citizens and leave them stranded at the mercy of merciless criminals.
Politically, they function as an opportunistic, hit and run, Marxist guerilla-like, front group. The organization should be outlawed as grossly inimical to freedom, contradictory to the Constitution and an insult to the Bill of Rights and the American people.
January 31st, 2009 at 4:28 pm
Reading more of Sarah Brady’s crap, I am reminded of something: Back in the mid-to-late ’90s sometime, I remember seeing a documentary about the shooting of Ronald Reagan and James Brady. A few frames showed James Brady on the ground with a large metallic object near his head. The picture was too grainy and unfocused to tell, but I am really curious to know: was Brady carrying a firearm when he was shot?
Anyone have any answers for me?
January 31st, 2009 at 4:44 pm
If you sign up for their e-mails, they consider you a member. Once I found that out, I had to threaten them under CAN-SPAM to get off the list when un-subscribe requests were ignored…
January 31st, 2009 at 6:48 pm
Anon, if you really think they considered you a member, try voting for their next president. The few restrictions the We Can Spam Act has don’t apply to political advocacy organizations.