His office has tried to stop him being linked negatively with the group many times.

He’s well aware of Bloomberg’s intentions.

Yet he’s stayed in the group. Until now.

I think that pretty much says all that needs to be said.

As a comparison, there is very little “illegal alcohol” – perhaps moonshine would be an example of “illegal alcohol”. By merely existing, moonshine is illegal (if my memory serves me correctly). But it is very possible for a person to “possess alcohol illegally”. That is what should be prosecuted.

Back to guns, with the exception of guns that are (what I call) ‘indiscriminate destructive devices’ (e.g. grenades, NBC, etc.), most guns are not illegal.

I told you that so I could tell you this:
Items 1, 3, 4, and 5 all reference “illegal guns”. Although a couple mention illegal actions in relation to the guns, we’ve already seen (as you illustrate, Uncle) that the wording is often twisted and mis-used. So for anyone to “sign-on” to this pledge indicates that they believe that there are sufficient quantities of “illegal guns” that a national working group is needed to act against it. That’s quite false.

And rather ignorant of the people who signed onto it.

Say anything to get elected and believe if you build it they will come.

With Lincoln Davis and Marsha Blackburn not running all Haslam has to do is beat Zach Wamp. So technically he is already our next Governor.

So five years from now will we be fighting an income tax and all kinds of new guns restrictions?