<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Due Process</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2009/01/12/due-process/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2009/01/12/due-process/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:17:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ParatrooperJJ</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2009/01/12/due-process/comment-page-1/#comment-213052</link>
		<dc:creator>ParatrooperJJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=21277#comment-213052</guid>
		<description>The problem with Lautenberg is that if you were convicted of DV in 1975 before the law went into effect, you are still a prohibited person.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with Lautenberg is that if you were convicted of DV in 1975 before the law went into effect, you are still a prohibited person.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Byrne</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2009/01/12/due-process/comment-page-1/#comment-213011</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Byrne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=21277#comment-213011</guid>
		<description>TROs are granted automatically in some states; and it would be a good challenge in one of those states.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TROs are granted automatically in some states; and it would be a good challenge in one of those states.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tam</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2009/01/12/due-process/comment-page-1/#comment-213004</link>
		<dc:creator>Tam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=21277#comment-213004</guid>
		<description>Yup.

There&#039;s (was?) a judge in Knoxville that handed out TRO&#039;s like party favors with any divorce, no matter how amicable.

If someone got declined on a TICs check and looked confused as to why, you could ask &quot;Have you gotten divorced recently?&quot; and amazingly often they&#039;d say &quot;Yes! How did you know?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s (was?) a judge in Knoxville that handed out TRO&#8217;s like party favors with any divorce, no matter how amicable.</p>
<p>If someone got declined on a TICs check and looked confused as to why, you could ask &#8220;Have you gotten divorced recently?&#8221; and amazingly often they&#8217;d say &#8220;Yes! How did you know?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: straightarrow</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2009/01/12/due-process/comment-page-1/#comment-212993</link>
		<dc:creator>straightarrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=21277#comment-212993</guid>
		<description>I believe that Uncle is right on that. What about TRO&#039;s, though?

 They are often pro forma requests, and granted just as automatically, in any legal dispute, especially divorces, even though there may be no factual basis for their issuance. Yet, the gun rights are lost without any opportunity for the target of such an order to respond or to demand any proof that he/she might accurately be deemed even a potential threat, let alone an actual threat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that Uncle is right on that. What about TRO&#8217;s, though?</p>
<p> They are often pro forma requests, and granted just as automatically, in any legal dispute, especially divorces, even though there may be no factual basis for their issuance. Yet, the gun rights are lost without any opportunity for the target of such an order to respond or to demand any proof that he/she might accurately be deemed even a potential threat, let alone an actual threat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2009/01/12/due-process/comment-page-1/#comment-212992</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=21277#comment-212992</guid>
		<description>i think it&#039;d be argued that the plea is the due process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think it&#8217;d be argued that the plea is the due process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2009/01/12/due-process/comment-page-1/#comment-212991</link>
		<dc:creator>ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=21277#comment-212991</guid>
		<description>What about Lautenburg? Some guys plead guilty on misdemeanor abuse/battery (?) charges in order to avoid an expensive court fight. Later they find that their 2nd Amendment rights are gone *poof* with no recourse and no ability to go back and do-over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about Lautenburg? Some guys plead guilty on misdemeanor abuse/battery (?) charges in order to avoid an expensive court fight. Later they find that their 2nd Amendment rights are gone *poof* with no recourse and no ability to go back and do-over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BWM</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2009/01/12/due-process/comment-page-1/#comment-212990</link>
		<dc:creator>BWM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=21277#comment-212990</guid>
		<description>lol -ev aments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol -ev aments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

