Now they know.

Spreading the love, Say Uncle at work. Making America better, one post at a time.

So at least 4 people saw those fields and said “ok”. They weren’t stupid. And – as I mull it over – the form probably had an official form number (in the bottom of the form, most official forms – public or internal – have a form number and effective date. That form number has to be registered with the state. So someone in that office looked at the form and went ‘no issues here’.

So at least 5 people saw those fields and said “ok”.

They may have been ignorant that they weren’t allowed to gather that information, but they were probably driven by an agenda as well. In the back of their mind, everyone knows that registration leads to confiscation. And that’s what libs want.

For that matter; don’t quote me on anything (except this sentence).

Are you sure about that?

I wouldn’t say we have “good” gun laws (the second amendment is about the only good gun law). It’s just that our laws carry fewer constitutional infringements than those of most other states. In WA state, you’re supposed to have a permit before you carry concealed, but there’s no instruction requirement. Idaho recognises WA’s carry permit, too. The two states have a “reciprocal agreement”, but even so I kept permits from both states for a while. Very few cops actually knew WTF was going on in that regard. I think they’re slightly better now.

A certificate of completion is all that’s required in Idaho

I thought y’all had good gun laws out there in the hairy-chested West. WTF is a “certificate of completion“?

I guarantee you that they were looking at this from the standpoint of a regulatory agency, concerned with minimizing liability should they certify someone who actually “qualified” with an M1 Pencil.

If that wasn’t their intent, what other possible intent could they have had?

“The roster [of makes and models] which was created in response to a Department audit finding, is used to verify certificates that are turned in after the class.” What possible use is there for a list of makes and models if they don’t require you to train on the same gun you’ll be carrying? I say this is nothing more than a left-over from attempts to create a firearm registry, and as such it should be eliminated post haste.

A certificate of completion is all that’s required in Idaho, and it says nothing about any particular gun. All that’s required to verify your certificate is to cross-check with the instructor’s records.

“The caliber is not required information.” Most model numbers these days are caliber-specific anyway (XD-40, Glock 21, etc.) especially for autos, which are far more popular for carry, so that’s mostly a line of crap. Just sayin’.

Good to see it wasn’t an issue.

They used to, before reform. I thing the training completion certificates are vestiges of the old system.

Y’all need to get rid of the training requirement in TN. We didn’t have it in Georgia and don’t in Indiana, and you don’t hear of anybody getting OK-coralled by untrained by permit holders in either of those states, do you?

Bonus: In Indy, you can carry in a frickin’ bar if you want to.

She stated that her office is in the process of issuing retraction letters regarding the requirement of serial numbers from carry permit instructors in the rosters that are required from each school.