Comments on: A post-Heller suit

By: Xrlq

Xrlq — Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:54:04 +0000

The beauty of the phrase “drug users lose second amendment rights” is that if they win, you can always turn it around and say “Drug losers use second amendment rights.”

By: anon

anon — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 19:25:22 +0000

I’m just as interested in when they get out… The Lefty’s always want to restore their voting rights, because they’ve ‘paid their dept’ (whether or not they’ve ever coughed up a cent of restitution), but oddly, those same Lefty activists never want to restore their gun rights… Odd, Huh? Kinda makes a person think: If we can’t trust them with a gun, how can you call then ‘reformed’. If they aren’t reformed, why are they being released?

By: Exurbankevin

Exurbankevin — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 17:45:56 +0000

Well, the drug users in knew in college had lost the ability to speak, (freely or not), and seemed uninterested in voting, along with any action not directly related to acquiring more drugs.

In their defense, though, they were REALLY good at assembling peaceably. Usually in somebody’s dorm room, with a bong…

By: georgeh

georgeh — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 17:20:39 +0000

Possess firearms and vote?
No way.

By: Kim du Toit

Kim du Toit — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:57:30 +0000

LOL, Uncle.

By: Manish

Manish — Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:42:02 +0000

Should they also lose their right to vote, speak freely, and peaceably assemble?

In many states they do lose their right to vote.