Comments on: Welcome Back http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/10/02/welcome-back-3/ Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:05:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: BobG http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/10/02/welcome-back-3/comment-page-1/#comment-208053 BobG Thu, 02 Oct 2008 23:56:18 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=18779#comment-208053 "Is the bailout bill just passed in the Senate yesterday unconstitutional?" When has that mattered in the past? “Is the bailout bill just passed in the Senate yesterday unconstitutional?”

When has that mattered in the past?

]]> By: workinwifdakids http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/10/02/welcome-back-3/comment-page-1/#comment-208051 workinwifdakids Thu, 02 Oct 2008 23:29:54 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=18779#comment-208051 I'm sure they'd say that they passed a Senate 'version' of the already-submitted House bill. I’m sure they’d say that they passed a Senate ‘version’ of the already-submitted House bill.

]]> By: John Hardin http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/10/02/welcome-back-3/comment-page-1/#comment-208050 John Hardin Thu, 02 Oct 2008 23:23:00 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=18779#comment-208050 <blockquote>...they didn’t add the pork to the bailout, they added the bailout to the pork.</blockquote> Snarf

…they didn’t add the pork to the bailout, they added the bailout to the pork.

Snarf

]]> By: DirtCrashr http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/10/02/welcome-back-3/comment-page-1/#comment-208048 DirtCrashr Thu, 02 Oct 2008 22:54:24 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=18779#comment-208048 Barak is a constitutional scholar, I'm sure he can explain the living-legality of it. Barak is a constitutional scholar, I’m sure he can explain the living-legality of it.

]]> By: KCSteve http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/10/02/welcome-back-3/comment-page-1/#comment-208047 KCSteve Thu, 02 Oct 2008 20:17:59 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=18779#comment-208047 What Erick said. Ace explained that they didn't add the pork to the bailout, they added the bailout to the pork. What Erick said.

Ace explained that they didn’t add the pork to the bailout, they added the bailout to the pork.

]]> By: Erick http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/10/02/welcome-back-3/comment-page-1/#comment-208041 Erick Thu, 02 Oct 2008 19:13:31 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=18779#comment-208041 Bill was passed as amendment to a bill already passed by House, so no problem there. Just "updating" something already started in the House. Bill was passed as amendment to a bill already passed by House, so no problem there. Just “updating” something already started in the House.

]]> By: ka http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/10/02/welcome-back-3/comment-page-1/#comment-208036 ka Thu, 02 Oct 2008 18:39:29 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=18779#comment-208036 Does unconstitutional even matter when it comes to the Feds any more? I mean, if there is some problem somewhere, any legislative or executive body in the land is free to address it right? Does unconstitutional even matter when it comes to the Feds any more? I mean, if there is some problem somewhere, any legislative or executive body in the land is free to address it right?

]]> By: Rabbit http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/10/02/welcome-back-3/comment-page-1/#comment-208035 Rabbit Thu, 02 Oct 2008 18:31:21 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=18779#comment-208035 I was always under the presumption, from my lessons around the 4th grade, that tax/revenue bills had to originate in the house before they could be presented to the Senate. This looks like, among other onerous things, a different kettle of stinky taxpayer funded fish that came to life from corpses sewn together in the Senate. Regards, Rabbit. I was always under the presumption, from my lessons around the 4th grade, that tax/revenue bills had to originate in the house before they could be presented to the Senate. This looks like, among other onerous things, a different kettle of stinky taxpayer funded fish that came to life from corpses sewn together in the Senate.

Regards,
Rabbit.

]]>