Comments on: reason to love America

By: Dr. Strangegun

Dr. Strangegun — Wed, 01 Oct 2008 03:23:09 +0000

Interesting question with a poor example. On close examination there are nipples present…

By: Les Jones

Les Jones — Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:34:23 +0000

It’s the Brass Pole Veterans for Truth.

By: workinwifdakids

workinwifdakids — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 22:10:20 +0000

Dunno, but my daughter got an eyeful this morning. She came in to ask me something, and… //shrugs//

My wife wanted to know why I was against her seeing half-ta-ta x2 when I don’t mind her helping me clean my guns.

By: Laurel

Laurel — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 20:39:57 +0000

Anyone else see the irony in a porn star preaching her values by saying:

“Everywhere we go or everytime we watch TV our socirty says it’s OK to have sex, irresponsible sex! And young girls especially thinks it’s ok because they can just get the baby sucked right out of them, no big deal.”

…???

By: JKB

JKB — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:46:25 +0000

Gravity and the weight of it on the mind

The tops of boobs are shown in defiance of gravity. Any relaxation of them and they slip lower out of sight. Or at least, reveal nothing more.

Whereas, the bottom of boobs peek out in harmony with gravity. The mind’s eye of the viewer naturally sees that if entropy were not opposed, revelation would be the reward. They threaten that any relaxation of control either by a deep sigh or lifting of the arms in gleeful embrace, they will slip out of their covering and into full view.

It is not what the sight of the bottom of boobs exposes to the eye but what it exposes to the mind of the viewer that makes them taboo.

By: Linoge

Linoge — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 16:11:23 +0000

Hell, not too long ago in Western history, ankles were horrifically taboo. Go figure.

By: gattsuru

gattsuru — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:43:59 +0000

The bottoms of breasts are generally considered more risque simply because fewer people show them off. On the other hand, when you start adding the areola, it gets more toward the nippled and dimed store. There's less space between the bottom side of a breast and the nipple, and the top cleavage and a nipple, so that probably adds to it. It's just a cultural taboo -- if you go to parts of Africa a few decades ago, there was no taboo on nipples but a major one on legs -- but perhaps an understandable one.

By: Boyd

Boyd — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 14:56:54 +0000

Not just the bottoms of the boobs, but the bottoms of the nipples, too.

That being said, I forced myself into researching this young 2nd Amendment proponent, and her web site has a couple of SFW videos of her shooting.

Among other things.

By: mike w.

mike w. — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:46:25 +0000

I’m guessing I probably shouldn’t click on that at work?…

By: Ahab

Ahab — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:31:15 +0000

Pornstars for McCain?