<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lost their MoJo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/08/13/lost-their-mojo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/08/13/lost-their-mojo/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:46:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bitter</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/08/13/lost-their-mojo/comment-page-1/#comment-205120</link>
		<dc:creator>Bitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 12:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=17292#comment-205120</guid>
		<description>To be fair, it did get traction.  The AP and just about every major national outlet picked it up, along with several local outlets.  However, it didn&#039;t get traction for &lt;i&gt;them&lt;/i&gt;.  That&#039;s why I think they kept trying so hard to come up with new angles, hoping they would get a boost from it.  Instead, everyone else just talked about it, but no one went through to read MoJo.

Like I said, it&#039;s actually a little sad in terms of the signal it sends to investigative reporting.  On the other hand, it&#039;s MoJo, so I&#039;m not exactly shedding tears over it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair, it did get traction.  The AP and just about every major national outlet picked it up, along with several local outlets.  However, it didn&#8217;t get traction for <i>them</i>.  That&#8217;s why I think they kept trying so hard to come up with new angles, hoping they would get a boost from it.  Instead, everyone else just talked about it, but no one went through to read MoJo.</p>
<p>Like I said, it&#8217;s actually a little sad in terms of the signal it sends to investigative reporting.  On the other hand, it&#8217;s MoJo, so I&#8217;m not exactly shedding tears over it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
