Comments on: I’m confused http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/08/05/im-confused/ Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you. Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:17:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: SayUncle http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/08/05/im-confused/comment-page-1/#comment-204732 SayUncle Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:41:41 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=17052#comment-204732 <blockquote>Why isn’t your publicly-expressed concern extended in part to what the newspaper did and to the fact that they won’t issue a retraction?</blockquote> Because I was unaware of any of that.

Why isn’t your publicly-expressed concern extended in part to what the newspaper did and to the fact that they won’t issue a retraction?

Because I was unaware of any of that.

]]> By: David Codrea http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/08/05/im-confused/comment-page-1/#comment-204727 David Codrea Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:03:35 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=17052#comment-204727 Oh, that's easy when you realize they selectively edited his letter to omit the lion's share of content and presented that last out of proper context. You do agree that context can be important, don't you? The letter, incidentally, was addressed to the reporter, cc'd to the editor, along with other emails from myself, the producers of the Waco DVDs, and others, with the intent of telling them they owed their readers a retraction. That they chose to present it as a heavily edited letter to the editor was their choice. Here's what confuses me: Why isn't your publicly-expressed concern extended in part to what the newspaper did and to the fact that they won't issue a retraction? Oh, that’s easy when you realize they selectively edited his letter to omit the lion’s share of content and presented that last out of proper context. You do agree that context can be important, don’t you? The letter, incidentally, was addressed to the reporter, cc’d to the editor, along with other emails from myself, the producers of the Waco DVDs, and others, with the intent of telling them they owed their readers a retraction. That they chose to present it as a heavily edited letter to the editor was their choice.

Here’s what confuses me: Why isn’t your publicly-expressed concern extended in part to what the newspaper did and to the fact that they won’t issue a retraction?

]]>