<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HR 6691</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/08/05/hr-6691/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/08/05/hr-6691/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:55:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JJR</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/08/05/hr-6691/comment-page-1/#comment-204730</link>
		<dc:creator>JJR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 17:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=17057#comment-204730</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve written my rep and told him to support HR6691.  For the heck of it, told him to propose an amendment to legalize concealed carry in the District, too, with the Texas CHL laws as a guide.

The Heller case mostly affirmed the right to KEEP arms....I&#039;d like to see the right to BEAR them (concealed) expanded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve written my rep and told him to support HR6691.  For the heck of it, told him to propose an amendment to legalize concealed carry in the District, too, with the Texas CHL laws as a guide.</p>
<p>The Heller case mostly affirmed the right to KEEP arms&#8230;.I&#8217;d like to see the right to BEAR them (concealed) expanded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/08/05/hr-6691/comment-page-1/#comment-204720</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 13:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=17057#comment-204720</guid>
		<description>The problem there is you have to show they are violating clearly established precedent.  Technically speaking, DC&#039;s ridiculous machine gun definition was never challenged.  You&#039;d have a hard time making the case in a civil suit, let a lone a criminal trial, which would be tried before a jury comprised of..... the people who elected Fenty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem there is you have to show they are violating clearly established precedent.  Technically speaking, DC&#8217;s ridiculous machine gun definition was never challenged.  You&#8217;d have a hard time making the case in a civil suit, let a lone a criminal trial, which would be tried before a jury comprised of&#8230;.. the people who elected Fenty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
