Brown acknowledged in his motion that Scalia wrote in the landmark decision that the court’s opinion “should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill.”

However, he said the court stopped short of declaring those laws constitutional. The law banning felons from gun possession is flawed because it does not delineate between going armed in public and in private, Brown argued.

well, he actually has an interesting argument that might actually be one that is worth pursuing… however, he is exactly the wrong person to make the argument.