<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on the ACLU and Heller</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/07/07/more-on-the-aclu-and-heller-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/07/07/more-on-the-aclu-and-heller-2/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:17:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack in Vermont</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/07/07/more-on-the-aclu-and-heller-2/comment-page-1/#comment-202765</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack in Vermont</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 19:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=16340#comment-202765</guid>
		<description>They posted as #775 They must have been at lunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They posted as #775 They must have been at lunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack in Vermont</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/07/07/more-on-the-aclu-and-heller-2/comment-page-1/#comment-202763</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack in Vermont</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 18:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=16340#comment-202763</guid>
		<description>I think all gun rights people should send money to defend civil rights 
I just sent comment#753 (if it passes their muster)

Members and contributors to the ACLU, and I’ll bet quite a few ACLU Staffers are appalled by this stance. I suggest donors consider tax exempt contibutions to a Civil Rights Defense fund that helps average hard working people abused by overzealous bureaucrats. Staffers in the D.C. area may consider sending a resume. Here are some recent civil rights cases.
http://www.nradefensefund.org/litigation.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think all gun rights people should send money to defend civil rights<br />
I just sent comment#753 (if it passes their muster)</p>
<p>Members and contributors to the ACLU, and I’ll bet quite a few ACLU Staffers are appalled by this stance. I suggest donors consider tax exempt contibutions to a Civil Rights Defense fund that helps average hard working people abused by overzealous bureaucrats. Staffers in the D.C. area may consider sending a resume. Here are some recent civil rights cases.<br />
<a href="http://www.nradefensefund.org/litigation.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.nradefensefund.org/litigation.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nomen Nescio</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/07/07/more-on-the-aclu-and-heller-2/comment-page-1/#comment-202759</link>
		<dc:creator>Nomen Nescio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=16340#comment-202759</guid>
		<description>they originally tried to get away without doing a blog post on &lt;em&gt;Heller &lt;/em&gt;at all, but folks started bringing it up on other threads on their blog anyway, so they had to open that one.

yeah, i think their grassroots are feeling somewhat poisoned at this point. crying shame, in a way, if only because of the lost opportunity. they&#039;ve been wrong about this for so long, if they&#039;d changed their mind now and eaten a bit of crow, they could&#039;ve done their own image and PR a heap of good --- stood on the old principles, acted non-partisan, ended up looking politically neutral and truly interested in civil rights above all else. but they went and blew it, and it&#039;s looking like a lot of camels&#039; backs are breaking because of it.

i would&#039;ve joined them, myself, if they&#039;d only straightened up and done the right thing. but they didn&#039;t. oh well, didn&#039;t really want to spend the money anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>they originally tried to get away without doing a blog post on <em>Heller </em>at all, but folks started bringing it up on other threads on their blog anyway, so they had to open that one.</p>
<p>yeah, i think their grassroots are feeling somewhat poisoned at this point. crying shame, in a way, if only because of the lost opportunity. they&#8217;ve been wrong about this for so long, if they&#8217;d changed their mind now and eaten a bit of crow, they could&#8217;ve done their own image and PR a heap of good &#8212; stood on the old principles, acted non-partisan, ended up looking politically neutral and truly interested in civil rights above all else. but they went and blew it, and it&#8217;s looking like a lot of camels&#8217; backs are breaking because of it.</p>
<p>i would&#8217;ve joined them, myself, if they&#8217;d only straightened up and done the right thing. but they didn&#8217;t. oh well, didn&#8217;t really want to spend the money anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/07/07/more-on-the-aclu-and-heller-2/comment-page-1/#comment-202754</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=16340#comment-202754</guid>
		<description>I counted 6 (out of 662).  http://borepatch.blogspot.com/2008/07/662-to-6.html

Lots of trolls towards the end, but the early comments seem pretty straight.  Also, it looks like this is a spillover from an earlier thread.  Don&#039;t think that the ACLU is doing themselves much good with the grass roots.  May play well with the big donors, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I counted 6 (out of 662).  <a href="http://borepatch.blogspot.com/2008/07/662-to-6.html" rel="nofollow">http://borepatch.blogspot.com/2008/07/662-to-6.html</a></p>
<p>Lots of trolls towards the end, but the early comments seem pretty straight.  Also, it looks like this is a spillover from an earlier thread.  Don&#8217;t think that the ACLU is doing themselves much good with the grass roots.  May play well with the big donors, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nomen Nescio</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/07/07/more-on-the-aclu-and-heller-2/comment-page-1/#comment-202743</link>
		<dc:creator>Nomen Nescio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=16340#comment-202743</guid>
		<description>i&#039;ve actually read through most of the (when i stopped) 703 comments, and i think 3 or 4 of them were in defense of the ACLU. and of those, IIRC, at least two were mostly just indignant at having the ACLU called a bunch of godless baby-murdering america-hating commie faggots --- of which invective there was a fair share, starting a bit past comment #200 and getting worse as the numbers counted up.

the pro-gun side wasn&#039;t showing its very best colors in that thread, although there was also &lt;em&gt;a lot &lt;/em&gt;of very principled, excellently reasoned disagreement with the ACLU, and some eloquently stated disappointment with their position from people who managed to express deeply felt sentiment both respectfully &lt;em&gt;and &lt;/em&gt;scathingly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ve actually read through most of the (when i stopped) 703 comments, and i think 3 or 4 of them were in defense of the ACLU. and of those, IIRC, at least two were mostly just indignant at having the ACLU called a bunch of godless baby-murdering america-hating commie faggots &#8212; of which invective there was a fair share, starting a bit past comment #200 and getting worse as the numbers counted up.</p>
<p>the pro-gun side wasn&#8217;t showing its very best colors in that thread, although there was also <em>a lot </em>of very principled, excellently reasoned disagreement with the ACLU, and some eloquently stated disappointment with their position from people who managed to express deeply felt sentiment both respectfully <em>and </em>scathingly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/07/07/more-on-the-aclu-and-heller-2/comment-page-1/#comment-202740</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=16340#comment-202740</guid>
		<description>My last count there were 3 pro-ACLU comments.  I stopped reading after about 300 comments though.  I&#039;d also estimate about 96-97% of the comments are high-quality, with only a handful containing name-calling and profanity.

Its kinda like the Brady blog of days gone by, only without the insufferable trolls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My last count there were 3 pro-ACLU comments.  I stopped reading after about 300 comments though.  I&#8217;d also estimate about 96-97% of the comments are high-quality, with only a handful containing name-calling and profanity.</p>
<p>Its kinda like the Brady blog of days gone by, only without the insufferable trolls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

