Comments on: 9-0 http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/06/30/9-0/ Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you. Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:33:21 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: John Phillips http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/06/30/9-0/comment-page-1/#comment-202507 John Phillips Mon, 30 Jun 2008 17:07:04 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=16289#comment-202507 The Supreme Court's Second Amendment ruling in Heller continues to give employers the right to ban guns/weapons from the workplace, subject to state laws as this post explains. http://hrheroblogs.com/theword/2008/06/30/bearing-arms-in-the-workplace/ The Supreme Court’s Second Amendment ruling in Heller continues to give employers the right to ban guns/weapons from the workplace, subject to state laws as this post explains.

http://hrheroblogs.com/theword/2008/06/30/bearing-arms-in-the-workplace/

]]> By: Ron W http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/06/30/9-0/comment-page-1/#comment-202503 Ron W Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:01:53 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=16289#comment-202503 When the 2nd Amendment (or any others of the Bill of Rights) is considered, it should also be in the context of the Premble to the Bill of Rights which says they are "added restrictive and delcarative clauses'. That is RESTRICTIVE of the Federal Gov't and DECLARATIVE of the rights of the people (or States). Those who assert thatt the mention of the militia is restrictive of the right of the people fail to see that the whole of the Bill of Rights is addressed to the Federal Government. So "a well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, is an explanatory sub-ordinate clause. It delegates no powers. "The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed " is the declarative of rights part of the sentence and it is also restrictive of the Federal Government to which it's addressed. Any delegated power re: the militia is left to the States (10th Amendment) therefore, ALL Federal gun laws are null and void, exept those applying to "that part of them" (the militia) which "may be employed..when called forth into the service of the United States"-----> Article I, Section 7. 15-16, U.S. Constitution When the 2nd Amendment (or any others of the Bill of Rights) is considered, it should also be in the context of the Premble to the Bill of Rights which says they are “added restrictive and delcarative clauses’. That is RESTRICTIVE of the Federal Gov’t and DECLARATIVE of the rights of the people (or States).

Those who assert thatt the mention of the militia is restrictive of the right of the people fail to see that the whole of the Bill of Rights is addressed to the Federal Government. So “a well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, is an explanatory sub-ordinate clause. It delegates no powers. “The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed ” is the declarative of rights part of the sentence and it is also restrictive of the Federal Government to which it’s addressed. Any delegated power re: the militia is left to the States (10th Amendment) therefore, ALL Federal gun laws are null and void, exept those applying to “that part of them” (the militia) which “may be employed..when called forth into the service of the United States”—–> Article I, Section 7. 15-16, U.S. Constitution

]]>