Well, maybe a little more. People are social cooperative animals and as Nietzsche said, “The nobility of slaves is defiance, the nobility of soldiers is obedience”.

I just don’t know how anyone would get by without dictation on how they can spend their money, and what guns are ok to own or not.

For example, I definitely would not want HardCorps by my side in a fight. He might decide that that was his naptime and who is anyone to tell him different?

Wouldn’t they allow me the freedom to live with anyone I choose? Would Libertarians stop me from joining a commune if it was my wish to do so?

you’re right, I should just walk up the nearest federal bldg and lie prostrate until they pick me up and put me in a rape cage for the rest of my life. What’s the point of fighting for freedom anymore right?

Wow, if these Benedict Arnolds are sharing their true thoughts on a blog, I doubt I’ll see them on the battle field by my side…but I might see them under my front sight post..?

Radley is trying to argue electability, and the Big-L anarchists are wandering off on debates about “Is child sex initiation of force?”.

You have the Anarchists wandering off into this kind of weirdness … and then you have the minarchist endorsing LINOs like the current candidate.

I think that, if you are serious about electioneering, you should just join the liberty caucus of one of the two big parties and be done with it.

I’d say that everyone else is lucky with “ornery”. If Ethan Allen were on the scene, he’d wheel-up cannon and start blowing great bloody holes in the Capitol dome.

That’s why man invented fences.