<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Park Carry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/05/01/park-carry-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/05/01/park-carry-2/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:57:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/05/01/park-carry-2/comment-page-1/#comment-199632</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 14:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/?p=15532#comment-199632</guid>
		<description>Hey Unc,

Speaking of National Park carry -- the rule is up for comment for the next 60 days.  You can be sure the VPC and the tree-huggers and the retired ranger fogey&#039;s association or whatever NPS-related group that was wimpering about this will be spamming... er exercising their 1A rights to make sure noone can exercise their 2A rights in a National Park or Wildlife Refuge.

I think it would be a good idea to have a surge of positive comments.  Maybe they will be ignored, but if they aren&#039;t there, it will leave a pool of negative comments for the NPS bureaucrats to wave at the Senators to say &quot;see? non of your constituents thought this was a good idea..&quot;.

Go here to comment:
http://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/main?main=DocumentDetail&amp;o=090000648053d497

Made my comment yesterday. Here you go:

&lt;em&gt;Excellent proposal, and long overdue. Actual experience of the shall-issue 
concealed handgun license (CHL) laws in the states that have implemented them 
has been overwhelmingly successful -- violations of ANY law by CHL holders has 
been miniscule, and actual gun-related violations have been even smaller. Crime 
rates are noticeably lower in those states that have CHLs, and in the unfortunate 
instances where a CHL holder was forced to use a handgun to defend his or others 
life, by far the law-abiding have prevailed and innocent lives saved. Please 
implement this rule at the earliest opportunity.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Unc,</p>
<p>Speaking of National Park carry &#8212; the rule is up for comment for the next 60 days.  You can be sure the VPC and the tree-huggers and the retired ranger fogey&#8217;s association or whatever NPS-related group that was wimpering about this will be spamming&#8230; er exercising their 1A rights to make sure noone can exercise their 2A rights in a National Park or Wildlife Refuge.</p>
<p>I think it would be a good idea to have a surge of positive comments.  Maybe they will be ignored, but if they aren&#8217;t there, it will leave a pool of negative comments for the NPS bureaucrats to wave at the Senators to say &#8220;see? non of your constituents thought this was a good idea..&#8221;.</p>
<p>Go here to comment:<br />
<a href="http://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/main?main=DocumentDetail&#038;o=090000648053d497" rel="nofollow">http://www.regulations.gov/fdmspublic/component/main?main=DocumentDetail&#038;o=090000648053d497</a></p>
<p>Made my comment yesterday. Here you go:</p>
<p><em>Excellent proposal, and long overdue. Actual experience of the shall-issue<br />
concealed handgun license (CHL) laws in the states that have implemented them<br />
has been overwhelmingly successful &#8212; violations of ANY law by CHL holders has<br />
been miniscule, and actual gun-related violations have been even smaller. Crime<br />
rates are noticeably lower in those states that have CHLs, and in the unfortunate<br />
instances where a CHL holder was forced to use a handgun to defend his or others<br />
life, by far the law-abiding have prevailed and innocent lives saved. Please<br />
implement this rule at the earliest opportunity.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

