Comments on: Obligatory Heller Round Up

By: straightarrrow

straightarrrow — Sun, 23 Mar 2008 08:51:30 +0000

Well as you know, I think “man” is giving you too much credit. Perhaps that is why we all get to have our say, because we have differing opinions even when on the same side?

Have you told Larry what you told us?

By: Sebastian

Sebastian — Fri, 21 Mar 2008 17:45:41 +0000

I think “professional” is giving them too much credit.

By: Xrlq

Xrlq — Fri, 21 Mar 2008 02:40:20 +0000

Larry the Prat didn’t bother to note that Justice Scalia saved Mr. Gura from his near own-goal by pointing out that reasonable regulation is not an infringement, which is a bit more sensible than arguing that reasonable infringement is OK. Of course, either view is equally unpalatable to professional whiners like GOA.

By: Alcibiades McZombie

Alcibiades McZombie — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:00:59 +0000

“Larry Pratt is slime.”

It should be, “Larry Pratt is a prat”. It’s just too good to pass up.

Or, call him “Larry Prattfall” or “Larry Prattling”.

By: Sebastian

Sebastian — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:13:21 +0000

I didn’t even watch it until you mentioned that ka. Smokin’ indeed.

By: ka

ka — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:31:41 +0000

You’ve all missed the really important part, including SayUncle.

… a video of [a smokin' hot woman demonstrates] Washington DC�s reasonable gun laws in action

By: Sebastian

Sebastian — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:14:08 +0000

Larry Pratt is slime. Gura has five justices on board with his argument, why the hell would he want to say anything that would jeopardize the win? Oral arguments aren’t a soap box where you get to say whatever you want. Gura had to win the case for his client, and while I do wish the plastic guns and machine gun issue hadn’t come up, and I think maybe Gura could have answered some of those questions better, but it’s easy for someone to say who wasn’t up there. Gura probably helped keep his five justice majority and secured the win for us. Pratt should keep his fucking mouth shut.

By: Jay

Jay — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 15:30:29 +0000

I know that GOA doesn’t have the same kind of budget that the NRA does, but they certainly have enough money to at the very least, create a website that doesn’t look like it was created at the time when the gopher protocol was still used regularly.

By: Carlton

Carlton — Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:32:59 +0000

Something I haven’t seen on another blog is how in the hell did the notorious “plastic gun that can evade metal detection” B.S. get mentioned in front of the Supreme Court on a landmark gun case!

Check out the transcripts on page 29, line 18, from the mouth of the Solicitor General, Paul Clement. Thanks jackass.

Don’t the anti-gunners say we’re picky about details and ask why we get pissed when they make shit up? This is precisely why.