<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What media bias . . .</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/03/12/what_media_bias_-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/03/12/what_media_bias_-3/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:05:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bitter</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/03/12/what_media_bias_-3/comment-page-1/#comment-196768</link>
		<dc:creator>Bitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/03/12/what_media_bias_-3/#comment-196768</guid>
		<description>I have to admit, getting that from Chicago-area media isn&#039;t unexpected.  Considering it&#039;s a Springfield event, and not knowing what follow-up was done with which reporters (did someone reach out to the capitol bureaus?), I would consider it reasonable to run an AP blurb.  Again, I don&#039;t know what the full media strategy, but given the market, I would be complaining unless there&#039;s much more that was done or promised in terms of coverage that didn&#039;t pan out.

From a strategic point of view, I&#039;d be more interested in what coverage they got in non-Chicago papers.  Again, that should be in the context of outreach and follow-up efforts and their targets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit, getting that from Chicago-area media isn&#8217;t unexpected.  Considering it&#8217;s a Springfield event, and not knowing what follow-up was done with which reporters (did someone reach out to the capitol bureaus?), I would consider it reasonable to run an AP blurb.  Again, I don&#8217;t know what the full media strategy, but given the market, I would be complaining unless there&#8217;s much more that was done or promised in terms of coverage that didn&#8217;t pan out.</p>
<p>From a strategic point of view, I&#8217;d be more interested in what coverage they got in non-Chicago papers.  Again, that should be in the context of outreach and follow-up efforts and their targets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

