<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tribal Influence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/03/05/tribal_influence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/03/05/tribal_influence/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:21:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: CT1Catfish</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/03/05/tribal_influence/comment-page-1/#comment-196563</link>
		<dc:creator>CT1Catfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 21:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/03/05/tribal_influence/#comment-196563</guid>
		<description>But I could yell FIRE in a crowded theatre if there was a fire, or if it was part of a planned and accepted action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But I could yell FIRE in a crowded theatre if there was a fire, or if it was part of a planned and accepted action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xrlq</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/03/05/tribal_influence/comment-page-1/#comment-196434</link>
		<dc:creator>Xrlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 14:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/03/05/tribal_influence/#comment-196434</guid>
		<description>SA: no rights are absolute, so if your theory is correct that &lt;i&gt;all&lt;/i&gt; rights are absolute, the only logical conclusion is that rights do not exist.  In which case, there&#039;s little point in discussing them, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SA: no rights are absolute, so if your theory is correct that <i>all</i> rights are absolute, the only logical conclusion is that rights do not exist.  In which case, there&#8217;s little point in discussing them, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/03/05/tribal_influence/comment-page-1/#comment-196432</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 13:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/03/05/tribal_influence/#comment-196432</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;All rights are absolute. Period.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Incorrect. If you yell &lt;em&gt;fire&lt;/em&gt; in a crowded theater, you&#039;re exercising your absolute right to speech in a manner harmful to others. And you deserve your ass kicked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>All rights are absolute. Period.</p></blockquote>
<p>Incorrect. If you yell <em>fire</em> in a crowded theater, you&#8217;re exercising your absolute right to speech in a manner harmful to others. And you deserve your ass kicked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: straightarrrow</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/03/05/tribal_influence/comment-page-1/#comment-196425</link>
		<dc:creator>straightarrrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 04:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/03/05/tribal_influence/#comment-196425</guid>
		<description>All rights are absolute. Period.

My rights do not allow me to infringe your rights. Until that point your opinion that my rights might be misused to abuse your rights and therefore you may truncate mine, is simply stupidity.

Were I the ambitious truncater of your rights because you might abuse them to violate mine is just as stupid.

All rights are absolute or they are not rights, only permissions at the sufferance of your masters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All rights are absolute. Period.</p>
<p>My rights do not allow me to infringe your rights. Until that point your opinion that my rights might be misused to abuse your rights and therefore you may truncate mine, is simply stupidity.</p>
<p>Were I the ambitious truncater of your rights because you might abuse them to violate mine is just as stupid.</p>
<p>All rights are absolute or they are not rights, only permissions at the sufferance of your masters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/03/05/tribal_influence/comment-page-1/#comment-196408</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 22:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/03/05/tribal_influence/#comment-196408</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s kind of funny that not all densely populated areas have a problem with gun crime.

I somehow don&#039;t get the impression that Salt Lake City and Bismark don&#039;t have the same violent crime problem as Detroit, St. Louis, Miami, Cleveland, Houston, D.C., etc.

Now why could that be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s kind of funny that not all densely populated areas have a problem with gun crime.</p>
<p>I somehow don&#8217;t get the impression that Salt Lake City and Bismark don&#8217;t have the same violent crime problem as Detroit, St. Louis, Miami, Cleveland, Houston, D.C., etc.</p>
<p>Now why could that be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron W</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/03/05/tribal_influence/comment-page-1/#comment-196378</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 18:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/03/05/tribal_influence/#comment-196378</guid>
		<description>Update: Jacob Sullum: Tribe ignores another aspect of D.C.’s gun law, the provision requiring that even long guns be kept “unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock.” That requirement makes it pretty hard to use any gun for self-defense, except maybe as a club.

Now are government agents and officials bound by that law? Article VI, Section 3 of the Constitutiton says they are &quot;bound by the law&quot;.  Oh that&#039;s right, they don&#039;t go by the law anymore...we&#039;re living under arbitrary government-----------&gt; tyranny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Update: Jacob Sullum: Tribe ignores another aspect of D.C.’s gun law, the provision requiring that even long guns be kept “unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock.” That requirement makes it pretty hard to use any gun for self-defense, except maybe as a club.</p>
<p>Now are government agents and officials bound by that law? Article VI, Section 3 of the Constitutiton says they are &#8220;bound by the law&#8221;.  Oh that&#8217;s right, they don&#8217;t go by the law anymore&#8230;we&#8217;re living under arbitrary government&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;&gt; tyranny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rustmeister</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/03/05/tribal_influence/comment-page-1/#comment-196356</link>
		<dc:creator>Rustmeister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 15:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/03/05/tribal_influence/#comment-196356</guid>
		<description>Classic example of &lt;em&gt;non sequitur&lt;/em&gt; - &quot;It does not follow&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Classic example of <em>non sequitur</em> &#8211; &#8220;It does not follow&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
