I thought Obama said he was for change. That sounds like the same old pandering politician who, when it suits their desire for arbitrary government, will violate the Constitution and Bill of Rights

I suppose Obama SAYS he’s “pro-choice” too. But what if a woman wants to exercise her choice and RIGHT to acquire, keep and carry the means to defend her own body against a robber, a muderer or a rapist. Does Obama support that choice? Hey, now that would be a change—if he did!

He has armed protection, but he supports denying that choice to his folks in Chicago and the folks in Washington, D.C. where he will have hired guns for his protection, but keep “the people” from having the same and tury to extend that tyranny to the rest of us. Now the latter may be change, but I and tens of millions more will resist that change!