Comments on: Park Carry http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/02/27/park_carry-2/ Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you. Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:02:09 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Cactus Jack http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/02/27/park_carry-2/comment-page-1/#comment-196009 Cactus Jack Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:43:18 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/02/27/park_carry-2/#comment-196009 bob r Says: "As to the concern that said arms to used “only for self-defense”, how about only punishing people for the wrong they do and not that which they have the capability to do but have not actually done?" Well said! It's too bad that many of our so called "leaders" dont understand that. bob r Says:

“As to the concern that said arms to used “only for self-defense”, how about only punishing people for the wrong they do and not that which they have the capability to do but have not actually done?”

Well said! It’s too bad that many of our so called “leaders” dont understand that.

]]> By: bob r http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/02/27/park_carry-2/comment-page-1/#comment-195997 bob r Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:52:09 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/02/27/park_carry-2/#comment-195997 @Southern Beale: Refer to the <a href="http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html" rel="nofollow">charter</a> for the Federal government; you will find that it is not within the purview of the Federal government to "permit" or to _deny_ the carrying of weapons in National Parks. You have to stretch things a bit to find it within its purview to even <i>have</i> National Parks. As to the concern that said arms to used "only for self-dense", how about only punishing people for the wrong they do and not that which they have the capability to do but have not actually done? @Southern Beale:
Refer to the charter for the Federal government; you will find that it is not within the purview of the Federal government to “permit” or to _deny_ the carrying of weapons in National Parks. You have to stretch things a bit to find it within its purview to even have National Parks.

As to the concern that said arms to used “only for self-dense”, how about only punishing people for the wrong they do and not that which they have the capability to do but have not actually done?

]]> By: SayUncle http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/02/27/park_carry-2/comment-page-1/#comment-195990 SayUncle Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:52:11 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/02/27/park_carry-2/#comment-195990 you can't. deal with it. but it's comforting that LAW ABIDING citizens won't be arrested for it. I'm more concerned about the folks who don't abide by the law who won't follow the rules anyway. you can’t. deal with it. but it’s comforting that LAW ABIDING citizens won’t be arrested for it. I’m more concerned about the folks who don’t abide by the law who won’t follow the rules anyway.

]]> By: Southern Beale http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/02/27/park_carry-2/comment-page-1/#comment-195989 Southern Beale Wed, 27 Feb 2008 15:47:56 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/02/27/park_carry-2/#comment-195989 " .. Regarding Permitting Law-Abiding Citizens to Carry/Possess Firearms for Self-Defense in National Parks ..." OH, great! Just LAW ABIDING citizens! Super! Now, how do we make sure that only LAW ABIDING citizens are carrying weapons in the parks? And how do we make sure LAW ABIDING citizens always use their weapons responsibly, and only for self-defense? ” .. Regarding Permitting Law-Abiding Citizens to Carry/Possess Firearms for Self-Defense in National Parks …”

OH, great! Just LAW ABIDING citizens! Super! Now, how do we make sure that only LAW ABIDING citizens are carrying weapons in the parks?

And how do we make sure LAW ABIDING citizens always use their weapons responsibly, and only for self-defense?

]]>