<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;m a gun owner but . . .</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/02/20/im_a_gun_owner_but_/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/02/20/im_a_gun_owner_but_/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:09:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Metulj</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/02/20/im_a_gun_owner_but_/comment-page-1/#comment-195544</link>
		<dc:creator>Metulj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/02/20/im_a_gun_owner_but_/#comment-195544</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get the &quot;legal owner&quot; and &quot;rights to own&quot; distinction. If the right is inalienable, then how can it be made illegal without the stripping of the right, which by definition is unforfeitable, not something that can be sold, and not something that can be transferred?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get the &#8220;legal owner&#8221; and &#8220;rights to own&#8221; distinction. If the right is inalienable, then how can it be made illegal without the stripping of the right, which by definition is unforfeitable, not something that can be sold, and not something that can be transferred?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
