Comments on: Sullivan once again blocked http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/02/14/sullivan_once_again_blocked/ Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you. Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:55:44 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Standard Mischief http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/02/14/sullivan_once_again_blocked/comment-page-1/#comment-195312 Standard Mischief Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:41:54 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/02/14/sullivan_once_again_blocked/#comment-195312 <blockquote>Of course a Democratic president would probably approve him.</blockquote> I'm not sure what you mean by this, remember, he was nominated by Bush, so he obviously approves too. Did it take the Heller brief to convince everyone that he's no friend to the RKBA?

Of course a Democratic president would probably approve him.

I’m not sure what you mean by this, remember, he was nominated by Bush, so he obviously approves too.

Did it take the Heller brief to convince everyone that he’s no friend to the RKBA?

]]> By: Robert http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/02/14/sullivan_once_again_blocked/comment-page-1/#comment-195295 Robert Thu, 14 Feb 2008 22:24:10 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/02/14/sullivan_once_again_blocked/#comment-195295 Bush and Rove have ruined the Republican Party as a home to conservatives by promoting...........people like this. I doubt he's much of a guardian of liberty as a fed prosecutor either. Bush and Rove have ruined the Republican Party as a home to conservatives by promoting………..people like this.

I doubt he’s much of a guardian of liberty as a fed prosecutor either.

]]> By: BobG http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/02/14/sullivan_once_again_blocked/comment-page-1/#comment-195269 BobG Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:28:53 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/02/14/sullivan_once_again_blocked/#comment-195269 Of course a Democratic president would probably approve him. Of course a Democratic president would probably approve him.

]]> By: Jim W http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/02/14/sullivan_once_again_blocked/comment-page-1/#comment-195266 Jim W Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:13:33 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/02/14/sullivan_once_again_blocked/#comment-195266 I knew that when they added the ATF director confirmation requirement back in 2005 that it would pay worthy dividends like this. The upshot is that we will eventually get ATF directors that reflect the gun attitudes of congress, not the attitudes of whoever the president owes a favor to. I knew that when they added the ATF director confirmation requirement back in 2005 that it would pay worthy dividends like this. The upshot is that we will eventually get ATF directors that reflect the gun attitudes of congress, not the attitudes of whoever the president owes a favor to.

]]> By: Sebastian http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/02/14/sullivan_once_again_blocked/comment-page-1/#comment-195259 Sebastian Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:57:04 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/02/14/sullivan_once_again_blocked/#comment-195259 He very well may not be confirmed at this point. Nonetheless, he'll be serving as director of ATF until Bush leaves office either way. I doubt at this point that Bush will withdraw the nomination. He very well may not be confirmed at this point. Nonetheless, he’ll be serving as director of ATF until Bush leaves office either way. I doubt at this point that Bush will withdraw the nomination.

]]>