Comments on: The War on three-dimensional devices designed or marketed as useful primarily for the stimulation of human genital organs

By: Alex

Alex — Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:32:11 +0000

Kristopher, it says “designed to STIMulate human genital organs,” not “designed to SIMulate human genital organs”!

By: Michael Hawkins

Michael Hawkins — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:19:50 +0000

The texas ban was overturned today …

By: fire

fire — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 04:21:31 +0000

Now why do they want to ban them? DAMN IT!! They are trying to take away all the things that I like. First guns…now this!!??

DAMN IT!!!!!!!!!!

By: Rivrdog

Rivrdog — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 04:10:02 +0000

Dildos? No, it’s “Dildoes”, and Dan Quayle told me so.

Nyah, Nyah, Nyah.

By: J T Bolt

J T Bolt — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:53:29 +0000

E Pluribus Dildo? Oh… I misread. You typed something else.

By: SayUncle

SayUncle — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:17:26 +0000

Kristopher, apparently so. I seem to recall that some devices are used to stimulate the genital organs of animals and those are necessary for certain types of farming.

By: Kristopher

Kristopher — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 22:13:42 +0000

So … would a dildo modeled on a non-human ( say, Homo Neandethalis ) be legal?

By: Molon Labe

Molon Labe — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:53:54 +0000

If it turns out that the government can ban dildos, where are they going to put people like Josh Sugarmann and Alexander T Riley?