<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Ruger LCP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/02/04/new_ruger_lcp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/02/04/new_ruger_lcp/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:46:58 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pat</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/02/04/new_ruger_lcp/comment-page-1/#comment-194704</link>
		<dc:creator>pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 01:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/02/04/new_ruger_lcp/#comment-194704</guid>
		<description>I imagine kel-tec and Ruger are together on this one, its probably made by Kel-tec for Ruger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I imagine kel-tec and Ruger are together on this one, its probably made by Kel-tec for Ruger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nill</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/02/04/new_ruger_lcp/comment-page-1/#comment-194669</link>
		<dc:creator>Nill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/02/04/new_ruger_lcp/#comment-194669</guid>
		<description>People who expect Kel-Tec to sue Ruger don&#039;t seem to realize that the P32/P3AT design is a derivative of past designs itself and never appears to have been patented. (direct kel-tec clones have been on the market for years now)

Anyway, if Ruger can make a better &quot;p3at&quot;, then all power to them.  The MSRP looks to be the same, and they&#039;ve made some obvious improvements (slide stop, grip ergonomics, etc).  And if the LCP ends up being as durable as Ruger&#039;s other pistols, then they have beaten Kel-Tec at their own game.

I&#039;m always concerned about the track record Kel-Tec has for a disproportionate number of small part failures after a couple hundred rounds.  Sure their lifetime free support will fix it right up for you, but normal practice shouldn&#039;t &quot;wear out&quot; something that you may have to defend your life with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who expect Kel-Tec to sue Ruger don&#8217;t seem to realize that the P32/P3AT design is a derivative of past designs itself and never appears to have been patented. (direct kel-tec clones have been on the market for years now)</p>
<p>Anyway, if Ruger can make a better &#8220;p3at&#8221;, then all power to them.  The MSRP looks to be the same, and they&#8217;ve made some obvious improvements (slide stop, grip ergonomics, etc).  And if the LCP ends up being as durable as Ruger&#8217;s other pistols, then they have beaten Kel-Tec at their own game.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m always concerned about the track record Kel-Tec has for a disproportionate number of small part failures after a couple hundred rounds.  Sure their lifetime free support will fix it right up for you, but normal practice shouldn&#8217;t &#8220;wear out&#8221; something that you may have to defend your life with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PawPaw</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/02/04/new_ruger_lcp/comment-page-1/#comment-194648</link>
		<dc:creator>PawPaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 15:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/02/04/new_ruger_lcp/#comment-194648</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t put down Ruger for copying a good design.  Heck, Smith and Wesson is making 1911&#039;s and Remington is making AR&#039;s.  Everybody and his dog copies to some extent.  If we only bought originals, Gustav Mauser would be the only guy making bolt-action rifles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t put down Ruger for copying a good design.  Heck, Smith and Wesson is making 1911&#8217;s and Remington is making AR&#8217;s.  Everybody and his dog copies to some extent.  If we only bought originals, Gustav Mauser would be the only guy making bolt-action rifles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/02/04/new_ruger_lcp/comment-page-1/#comment-194644</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 15:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/02/04/new_ruger_lcp/#comment-194644</guid>
		<description>And &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gregandbeth.com/blog/index.php?action=view&amp;id=800&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And <a href="http://www.gregandbeth.com/blog/index.php?action=view&amp;id=800" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/02/04/new_ruger_lcp/comment-page-1/#comment-194641</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/02/04/new_ruger_lcp/#comment-194641</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m thinking they wanted to release a pistol that already had compatible holsters on the market. That&#039;s the biggest drawback of my P345. New gun, few holster options outside the generic one-size-fits-all variety.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thinking they wanted to release a pistol that already had compatible holsters on the market. That&#8217;s the biggest drawback of my P345. New gun, few holster options outside the generic one-size-fits-all variety.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/02/04/new_ruger_lcp/comment-page-1/#comment-194640</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/02/04/new_ruger_lcp/#comment-194640</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an ounce heavier and half a smidgen bigger. And it lacks the &quot;made in Chinese sweatshop&quot; look of the Kel-Tecs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an ounce heavier and half a smidgen bigger. And it lacks the &#8220;made in Chinese sweatshop&#8221; look of the Kel-Tecs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/02/04/new_ruger_lcp/comment-page-1/#comment-194637</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/02/04/new_ruger_lcp/#comment-194637</guid>
		<description>https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=16931410&amp;postID=7732921492331030015
Nope, you&#039;re not the only one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=16931410&amp;postID=7732921492331030015" rel="nofollow">https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=16931410&amp;postID=7732921492331030015</a><br />
Nope, you&#8217;re not the only one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rustmeister</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/02/04/new_ruger_lcp/comment-page-1/#comment-194633</link>
		<dc:creator>Rustmeister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/02/04/new_ruger_lcp/#comment-194633</guid>
		<description>I was thinking about picking one up before Kel-Tec sues the pants off Ruger. =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was thinking about picking one up before Kel-Tec sues the pants off Ruger. =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
