http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/01/29/linguistics/ Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you. Fri, 19 Mar 2010 16:34:50 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/01/29/linguistics/comment-page-1/#comment-194342 Ravenwood Wed, 30 Jan 2008 02:27:43 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/01/29/linguistics/#comment-194342 The Amendment clearly states that guns are for family protection, hunting dangerous or delicious animals, and keeping the King of England out of your face! The Amendment clearly states that guns are for family protection, hunting dangerous or delicious animals, and keeping the King of England out of your face!

]]> http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/01/29/linguistics/comment-page-1/#comment-194337 Xrlq Tue, 29 Jan 2008 23:46:20 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/01/29/linguistics/#comment-194337 I think it's fair to say that perpetuation of a well-regulated militia is the purpose of the Second Amendment. It's not a fair reading, however, to say that the RKBA has no constitutional protection in other contexts. Cf. commercial speech and the First Amendment. I think it’s fair to say that perpetuation of a well-regulated militia is the purpose of the Second Amendment. It’s not a fair reading, however, to say that the RKBA has no constitutional protection in other contexts. Cf. commercial speech and the First Amendment.

]]> http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/01/29/linguistics/comment-page-1/#comment-194303 Phelps Tue, 29 Jan 2008 16:07:55 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/01/29/linguistics/#comment-194303 Yes, because the Founders felt that the right to serve in the state's army was a right that needed to protected right after speech, press and religion. Yes, because the Founders felt that the right to serve in the state’s army was a right that needed to protected right after speech, press and religion.

]]>