<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another case of the press taking dictation from The Violence Policy Center</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:09:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: markm</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/comment-page-1/#comment-193340</link>
		<dc:creator>markm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 21:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/#comment-193340</guid>
		<description>Cooked statistics or not, the main thing is that the reasons for gun-owners to lie when asked this question keep getting stronger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cooked statistics or not, the main thing is that the reasons for gun-owners to lie when asked this question keep getting stronger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/comment-page-1/#comment-193296</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 12:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/#comment-193296</guid>
		<description>First off public polling of firearm possession is unlikely to be accurate; how many gun owners polled replied falsely?  As the war on guns has ratcheted up so has fear of persecution, so naturally people would lie to protect themselves.

Secondly on the matter of how many Americans own guns and the size of the &#039;gun culture&#039;, I am going to violate what I just said and refer to polling data!  I don&#039;t remember where I saw it, but some poll indicated that 10 percent of the public owned 77 percent of all the guns.  From my own experience in the &#039;gun culture&#039; that is a number that feels intuitively correct.  The real size of the American gun culture is probably about that small and the other gun owners are either casual or accidental owners of guns, such as the widow who inherits some guns.

But conversely the size of the &#039;anti-gun culture&#039;, that constellation of crusaders, activists, bigots, and true believers who want to legislate the gun culture out of existence is probably much much smaller than the gun culture.  Taking a rough guess based on HCI vs NRA membership rolls I&#039;d say the anti-gun culture is about 1/10 the size of the gun culture.

So the real battle over gun control in the U.S. is of a tiny bigoted minority of Americans who belong to the anti-gun culture trying to persecute the larger group, but still small minority, of Americans who belong to gun culture.  The vast great majority of Americans are really indifferent to the issue of guns.   This is the key to understanding the politics of gun control in America.

Even though some polls might sometimes indicate &#039;majority&#039; support for increasing some kind of stricter gun control, this almost never plays out in public when it comes to actual election results because the public by and large doesn&#039;t care enough about the issue to effect their vote.  Of those who DO care enough about the issue, the pro-gun side outnumbers the anti-gun side by about 10 to 1.  That is why gun control is ultimately a political loser at the national level.  Only in a small area of the nation in certain localities, such as San Francisco, is their a real majority in favor of gun prohibition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off public polling of firearm possession is unlikely to be accurate; how many gun owners polled replied falsely?  As the war on guns has ratcheted up so has fear of persecution, so naturally people would lie to protect themselves.</p>
<p>Secondly on the matter of how many Americans own guns and the size of the &#8216;gun culture&#8217;, I am going to violate what I just said and refer to polling data!  I don&#8217;t remember where I saw it, but some poll indicated that 10 percent of the public owned 77 percent of all the guns.  From my own experience in the &#8216;gun culture&#8217; that is a number that feels intuitively correct.  The real size of the American gun culture is probably about that small and the other gun owners are either casual or accidental owners of guns, such as the widow who inherits some guns.</p>
<p>But conversely the size of the &#8216;anti-gun culture&#8217;, that constellation of crusaders, activists, bigots, and true believers who want to legislate the gun culture out of existence is probably much much smaller than the gun culture.  Taking a rough guess based on HCI vs NRA membership rolls I&#8217;d say the anti-gun culture is about 1/10 the size of the gun culture.</p>
<p>So the real battle over gun control in the U.S. is of a tiny bigoted minority of Americans who belong to the anti-gun culture trying to persecute the larger group, but still small minority, of Americans who belong to gun culture.  The vast great majority of Americans are really indifferent to the issue of guns.   This is the key to understanding the politics of gun control in America.</p>
<p>Even though some polls might sometimes indicate &#8216;majority&#8217; support for increasing some kind of stricter gun control, this almost never plays out in public when it comes to actual election results because the public by and large doesn&#8217;t care enough about the issue to effect their vote.  Of those who DO care enough about the issue, the pro-gun side outnumbers the anti-gun side by about 10 to 1.  That is why gun control is ultimately a political loser at the national level.  Only in a small area of the nation in certain localities, such as San Francisco, is their a real majority in favor of gun prohibition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark B.</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/comment-page-1/#comment-193277</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/#comment-193277</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;&quot;Actually, I call bullshit on the very first statistic.

&quot;U.S. pop in 1980 (close enough): 226 million.

&quot;If the “54% gun owners” number is correct, does that mean that there were 100-odd million gun owners in 1977?

&quot;I wish.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Concur with you there, Kim.  Not even close.  No way there were some 130 million gun owners then, not even including those with wall-hangers and non-functioning family heirlooms.  The author (whoever the hell it really was) cooked the books. 

Stipulating that the plural of anecdote is not &quot;data&quot;, I think there&#039;s also an underlying demographic phenomenon going on here.  I&#039;m a tail-end boomer (born 1959) and graduated high school in &#039;77, a member of the largest class to have graduated from that particular high school -- before or since.  Now I&#039;ll grant that the district is in rural far northwestern Kansas, where populations are declining anyway, but what I think may be going on here is that folks my age didn&#039;t have a lot of disposable cash to play with during the &#039;80s and &#039;90s.  

We were busy paying for our educations, applying for entry-level professional positions, starting families and buying homes, for example -- and dealing with Jimmeh&#039;s stagflation and astronomical interest rates.  Now that us boomers are in our late forties, fifties, and early sixties we&#039;ve got some jingle in our jeans and can afford to buy the sorts of firepower we couldn&#039;t back then.  In my own case, although I owned, and had since early high school, a 12-guage shotgun, I couldn&#039;t (and didn&#039;t) afford to spring for much more than a fifth-hand Raven or Jennings until I was almost 30 -- and those aren&#039;t firearms anyway, they&#039;re paperweights. 

Stats geeks (like Kim) could probably dig up the relevant data and analyze what I&#039;m suggesting here.  

&#039;Berg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;Actually, I call bullshit on the very first statistic.</p>
<p>&#8220;U.S. pop in 1980 (close enough): 226 million.</p>
<p>&#8220;If the “54% gun owners” number is correct, does that mean that there were 100-odd million gun owners in 1977?</p>
<p>&#8220;I wish.&#8221;</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Concur with you there, Kim.  Not even close.  No way there were some 130 million gun owners then, not even including those with wall-hangers and non-functioning family heirlooms.  The author (whoever the hell it really was) cooked the books. </p>
<p>Stipulating that the plural of anecdote is not &#8220;data&#8221;, I think there&#8217;s also an underlying demographic phenomenon going on here.  I&#8217;m a tail-end boomer (born 1959) and graduated high school in &#8216;77, a member of the largest class to have graduated from that particular high school &#8212; before or since.  Now I&#8217;ll grant that the district is in rural far northwestern Kansas, where populations are declining anyway, but what I think may be going on here is that folks my age didn&#8217;t have a lot of disposable cash to play with during the &#8217;80s and &#8217;90s.  </p>
<p>We were busy paying for our educations, applying for entry-level professional positions, starting families and buying homes, for example &#8212; and dealing with Jimmeh&#8217;s stagflation and astronomical interest rates.  Now that us boomers are in our late forties, fifties, and early sixties we&#8217;ve got some jingle in our jeans and can afford to buy the sorts of firepower we couldn&#8217;t back then.  In my own case, although I owned, and had since early high school, a 12-guage shotgun, I couldn&#8217;t (and didn&#8217;t) afford to spring for much more than a fifth-hand Raven or Jennings until I was almost 30 &#8212; and those aren&#8217;t firearms anyway, they&#8217;re paperweights. </p>
<p>Stats geeks (like Kim) could probably dig up the relevant data and analyze what I&#8217;m suggesting here.  </p>
<p>&#8216;Berg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/comment-page-1/#comment-193268</link>
		<dc:creator>D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/#comment-193268</guid>
		<description>thing is... guns don&#039;t mysteriously de-materialize, just becuase you stop thinking about them. If you got the family heirlooms passed down to you, where are they in the statistics? People who own and use guns might be changing, I believe. Hunting, has become somewhat less popular as the years have gone on, and that makes a difference. You don&#039;t necessarily shoot a handgun much, esp. with the range issues that have been pointed out. But if you go hunting every year, or more than once a year.. then you have more comefort being around guns, even if you are using different sorts... And then there are concerned citizens like me. I know how to use &#039;em, but currently I have no need of one. If it looked like I did, I wouldn&#039;t hesitate. In addition, I will always support the second as the right of an individual. If there was some kind of nightmare scenario where we were being invaded by guys-from-somewhere-else... well then I have a friend who like to collect the things, and he could surely arm me and 10 others for protection.

So... the other thing? The never was a &#039;gun-culture&#039; that is some kind of monolithinc entity...There are legal owners that have their reasons, and there are criminals that... are criminals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thing is&#8230; guns don&#8217;t mysteriously de-materialize, just becuase you stop thinking about them. If you got the family heirlooms passed down to you, where are they in the statistics? People who own and use guns might be changing, I believe. Hunting, has become somewhat less popular as the years have gone on, and that makes a difference. You don&#8217;t necessarily shoot a handgun much, esp. with the range issues that have been pointed out. But if you go hunting every year, or more than once a year.. then you have more comefort being around guns, even if you are using different sorts&#8230; And then there are concerned citizens like me. I know how to use &#8216;em, but currently I have no need of one. If it looked like I did, I wouldn&#8217;t hesitate. In addition, I will always support the second as the right of an individual. If there was some kind of nightmare scenario where we were being invaded by guys-from-somewhere-else&#8230; well then I have a friend who like to collect the things, and he could surely arm me and 10 others for protection.</p>
<p>So&#8230; the other thing? The never was a &#8216;gun-culture&#8217; that is some kind of monolithinc entity&#8230;There are legal owners that have their reasons, and there are criminals that&#8230; are criminals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim du Toit</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/comment-page-1/#comment-193266</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim du Toit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 19:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/#comment-193266</guid>
		<description>Actually, I call bullshit on the very first statistic.

U.S. pop in 1980 (close enough): 226 million.

If the &quot;54% gun owners&quot; number is correct, does that mean that there were 100-odd million gun owners in 1977?

I wish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I call bullshit on the very first statistic.</p>
<p>U.S. pop in 1980 (close enough): 226 million.</p>
<p>If the &#8220;54% gun owners&#8221; number is correct, does that mean that there were 100-odd million gun owners in 1977?</p>
<p>I wish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alcibiades McZombie</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/comment-page-1/#comment-193265</link>
		<dc:creator>Alcibiades McZombie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/#comment-193265</guid>
		<description>Gun ownership declined in the 80s and 90s, at least in part, because of all the restrictions governments started adding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gun ownership declined in the 80s and 90s, at least in part, because of all the restrictions governments started adding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/comment-page-1/#comment-193260</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/#comment-193260</guid>
		<description>I found myself accidentally sucked into the &quot;gun culture&quot; back around 1995 when I was 21, had extra money on hand, and thought it would be cool to own a handgun, even if it was impractical and expensive to shoot.  It was all downhill after that.

It&#039;s been my experience since this time, both with friends and on online forums, that there is less and less uneasiness and ignorance of guns, especially the evil black rifles.  It&#039;s seems like everyone is getting or owns an AR-15 now.  Furthermore, the gunowners of today do not take their freedoms for granted like the fudds of old and are, as a result, much more politically active.

So even if the total number of gunowners has decreased, more and more are valuing guns for defense instead of hunting.  Consequently, the number who are willing to vote to protect their rights has increased as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found myself accidentally sucked into the &#8220;gun culture&#8221; back around 1995 when I was 21, had extra money on hand, and thought it would be cool to own a handgun, even if it was impractical and expensive to shoot.  It was all downhill after that.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been my experience since this time, both with friends and on online forums, that there is less and less uneasiness and ignorance of guns, especially the evil black rifles.  It&#8217;s seems like everyone is getting or owns an AR-15 now.  Furthermore, the gunowners of today do not take their freedoms for granted like the fudds of old and are, as a result, much more politically active.</p>
<p>So even if the total number of gunowners has decreased, more and more are valuing guns for defense instead of hunting.  Consequently, the number who are willing to vote to protect their rights has increased as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/comment-page-1/#comment-193259</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/#comment-193259</guid>
		<description>So the gun culture is a minority. Isn&#039;t that a Good Thing? I mean, don&#039;t we PROTECT minorities in this countrry?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the gun culture is a minority. Isn&#8217;t that a Good Thing? I mean, don&#8217;t we PROTECT minorities in this countrry?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/comment-page-1/#comment-193258</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/#comment-193258</guid>
		<description>CCMCornell &amp; Crazy Gun Guy make excellent points.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CCMCornell &#038; Crazy Gun Guy make excellent points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CCMCornell</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/comment-page-1/#comment-193257</link>
		<dc:creator>CCMCornell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/#comment-193257</guid>
		<description>Even if gun ownership was sinking into a minority, what difference would that make?  Isn&#039;t oppression of a minority by a majority still wrong?  Aren&#039;t the rights stated in the Constitution amendments supposed to protect us from even majority-supported government action?  And what of justification for laws?  The link between legal gun ownership and threat to safety is lacking in evidence.

As to gun culture, to what extent has culture in this regard been affected by government coercion through limitations imposed by bans and extensive bureaucratic checks and paperwork?  People need to remember that the Caesars, Hitlers, segregations and genocides were put in force by majority-supported governments and those governments, in turn, supported the related cultural values.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if gun ownership was sinking into a minority, what difference would that make?  Isn&#8217;t oppression of a minority by a majority still wrong?  Aren&#8217;t the rights stated in the Constitution amendments supposed to protect us from even majority-supported government action?  And what of justification for laws?  The link between legal gun ownership and threat to safety is lacking in evidence.</p>
<p>As to gun culture, to what extent has culture in this regard been affected by government coercion through limitations imposed by bans and extensive bureaucratic checks and paperwork?  People need to remember that the Caesars, Hitlers, segregations and genocides were put in force by majority-supported governments and those governments, in turn, supported the related cultural values.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crazy Gun Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/comment-page-1/#comment-193254</link>
		<dc:creator>Crazy Gun Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/#comment-193254</guid>
		<description>Gun &lt;i&gt;ownership&lt;/i&gt; may be increasing, but I think the &lt;a href=&quot;http://john-ross.net/culture.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;gun &lt;i&gt;culture&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; is in serious trouble.

Just because somebody purchases a .22 or .38, maybe gets some training (often of dubious quality), and then leaves the gun in the nightstand for a few years does not make him a member of the gun culture.  Or even dependable pro-gun voters.

The big problem is the dwindling access of to places to shoot.  I don&#039;t know about the rest of the nation, but where I live (Colorado), population increase and development have closed a few ranges.  The ones that remain -- an hour or more drive away -- are more crowded.  Add to the mix that Range Officers often act like elitist dicks -- in the name of &quot;safety,&quot; of course, and not some power trip -- and other gun club members are only slight less pleasant to be around, I&#039;ve given up on trying to get people involved in shooing many years ago.

It&#039;s simply not worth it to drive 60 or so miles each way (especially with today&#039;s gas prices) to have an experience that&#039;s often more stressful than enjoyable.  Perhaps when I have my own private shooting range someday, that will change.  Until then, Ive let my CCW expire.  And I&#039;m selling off my gun collection that&#039;s so large, the inmates in Canon City know &lt;i&gt;me&lt;/i&gt; as &quot;Crazy Gun Guy.&quot;  Not only is shooting &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.peeniewallie.com/r2/docs/JohnRoss-firearms_advice_for_newbies.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a hell of a lot of work if you don&#039;t like it&lt;/a&gt;,&quot; it&#039;s become a lot more work for those of us that do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gun <i>ownership</i> may be increasing, but I think the <a href="http://john-ross.net/culture.php" rel="nofollow">gun <i>culture</i></a> is in serious trouble.</p>
<p>Just because somebody purchases a .22 or .38, maybe gets some training (often of dubious quality), and then leaves the gun in the nightstand for a few years does not make him a member of the gun culture.  Or even dependable pro-gun voters.</p>
<p>The big problem is the dwindling access of to places to shoot.  I don&#8217;t know about the rest of the nation, but where I live (Colorado), population increase and development have closed a few ranges.  The ones that remain &#8212; an hour or more drive away &#8212; are more crowded.  Add to the mix that Range Officers often act like elitist dicks &#8212; in the name of &#8220;safety,&#8221; of course, and not some power trip &#8212; and other gun club members are only slight less pleasant to be around, I&#8217;ve given up on trying to get people involved in shooing many years ago.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s simply not worth it to drive 60 or so miles each way (especially with today&#8217;s gas prices) to have an experience that&#8217;s often more stressful than enjoyable.  Perhaps when I have my own private shooting range someday, that will change.  Until then, Ive let my CCW expire.  And I&#8217;m selling off my gun collection that&#8217;s so large, the inmates in Canon City know <i>me</i> as &#8220;Crazy Gun Guy.&#8221;  Not only is shooting &#8220;<a href="http://www.peeniewallie.com/r2/docs/JohnRoss-firearms_advice_for_newbies.html" rel="nofollow">a hell of a lot of work if you don&#8217;t like it</a>,&#8221; it&#8217;s become a lot more work for those of us that do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/comment-page-1/#comment-193249</link>
		<dc:creator>d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/#comment-193249</guid>
		<description>nice, was hoping you&#039;d get around to spanking this guy. this sort of thing
&lt;em&gt;
&quot;Written 219 years ago, [The 2nd Amendment] says...&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

pisses me off too. Like the First Amendment wasn&#039;t. 

so much for your blood pressue though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nice, was hoping you&#8217;d get around to spanking this guy. this sort of thing<br />
<em><br />
&#8220;Written 219 years ago, [The 2nd Amendment] says&#8230;&#8221;</em></p>
<p>pisses me off too. Like the First Amendment wasn&#8217;t. </p>
<p>so much for your blood pressue though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buzz</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/comment-page-1/#comment-193248</link>
		<dc:creator>buzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/#comment-193248</guid>
		<description>The spike in sales after 9/11 or Katrina or even the LA riots prove the pro 2nd amendment point.  While maybe not all homes have guns, clearly there is a large segment who want the option to buy one when they feel it&#039;s needed.  I don&#039;t write letters to the editor critical of the government on a regular basis, but that doesn&#039;t mean I don&#039;t value my 1st amendment rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The spike in sales after 9/11 or Katrina or even the LA riots prove the pro 2nd amendment point.  While maybe not all homes have guns, clearly there is a large segment who want the option to buy one when they feel it&#8217;s needed.  I don&#8217;t write letters to the editor critical of the government on a regular basis, but that doesn&#8217;t mean I don&#8217;t value my 1st amendment rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/comment-page-1/#comment-193247</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/#comment-193247</guid>
		<description>Yes. Very good post and right on the money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. Very good post and right on the money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/comment-page-1/#comment-193242</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2008/01/10/another_case_of_the_press_taking_dictation_from_the_violence_policy_center/#comment-193242</guid>
		<description>Good post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
