<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/11/12/privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/11/12/privacy/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:09:19 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SayUncle &#187; More on privacy</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/11/12/privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-188135</link>
		<dc:creator>SayUncle &#187; More on privacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/11/12/privacy/#comment-188135</guid>
		<description>[...] that guy that said we had to change the definition of privacy because, err, not sure why? Well, turns out the reporter got it wrong: The reporter got it wrong. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that guy that said we had to change the definition of privacy because, err, not sure why? Well, turns out the reporter got it wrong: The reporter got it wrong. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Huffman</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/11/12/privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-187322</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Huffman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 01:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/11/12/privacy/#comment-187322</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;government and businesses properly safeguard people’s private communications and financial information&lt;/blockquote&gt;Wow! Have I got some great examples of the government safeguarding &quot;private&quot; information. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/IBM-Holocaust-Strategic-Alliance-Corporation/dp/0609808990/ref=pd_bbs_2/102-3703383-2504131?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1194919033&amp;sr=8-2&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Businesses&lt;/a&gt; don&#039;t have a good track record either. I should do a post on this...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>government and businesses properly safeguard people’s private communications and financial information</p></blockquote>
<p>Wow! Have I got some great examples of the government safeguarding &#8220;private&#8221; information. <a href="http://www.amazon.com/IBM-Holocaust-Strategic-Alliance-Corporation/dp/0609808990/ref=pd_bbs_2/102-3703383-2504131?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1194919033&amp;sr=8-2" rel="nofollow">Businesses</a> don&#8217;t have a good track record either. I should do a post on this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: straightarrow</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/11/12/privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-187292</link>
		<dc:creator>straightarrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/11/12/privacy/#comment-187292</guid>
		<description>All the dancing around this issue won&#039;t fix it.  When such as this becomes prohibitively dangerous for them to do, they will hide it better.  Hiding it doesn&#039;t sound like a win until one realizes that they cannot then use it as justification for taking ever more power without exposing the fact they are doing it. 

Until we decide to not be sheep and instead develop some teeth and the will to use them we will be the ones eaten.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the dancing around this issue won&#8217;t fix it.  When such as this becomes prohibitively dangerous for them to do, they will hide it better.  Hiding it doesn&#8217;t sound like a win until one realizes that they cannot then use it as justification for taking ever more power without exposing the fact they are doing it. </p>
<p>Until we decide to not be sheep and instead develop some teeth and the will to use them we will be the ones eaten.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cactus Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/11/12/privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-187289</link>
		<dc:creator>Cactus Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 19:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/11/12/privacy/#comment-187289</guid>
		<description>&quot;a top intelligence official says it is time that people in the United States changed their definition of privacy.&quot;

Who the hell is this cull to decide what constitutes privacy? I&#039;ll bet that HE would&#039;nt want anyone invading HIS privacy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;a top intelligence official says it is time that people in the United States changed their definition of privacy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Who the hell is this cull to decide what constitutes privacy? I&#8217;ll bet that HE would&#8217;nt want anyone invading HIS privacy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Standard Mischief</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/11/12/privacy/comment-page-1/#comment-187261</link>
		<dc:creator>Standard Mischief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/11/12/privacy/#comment-187261</guid>
		<description>RE: it doesn&#039;t mean what you think it means

Wow, it&#039;s like it&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_chip&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;1993 all over again.&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Privacy no longer can mean anonymity&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Wow, talk about your NewSpeak.

RE:telecom companies immunity

Threat Level has been covering this extensively. There are some &lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/wired27b/~3/173656283/senator-denies-.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;eye opening graphs here&lt;/a&gt;. There&#039;s some coverage of &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/11/att-whistle-blo.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Mark Klein and his insight on how throughly the FedGoonz&lt;/a&gt; are scraping teh web of &#039;net, looking for the terrorists, and monitoring those who would protest against &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/01/27/protecting_honey_baked_ham_from_terrorists/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;honey-baked hams&lt;/a&gt;

Lean Left covers the &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.leanleft.com/archives/2007/11/06/6330/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;immunity for telco corporate-personhood thingys&lt;/a&gt;&quot; and manages not to say &quot;Democrats&quot;, (To be fair, there also isn&#039;t a reference to Republicans either).

Telco Immunity is something we can&#039;t just let slide by. with broad based bipartisan congress-critter support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: it doesn&#8217;t mean what you think it means</p>
<p>Wow, it&#8217;s like it&#8217;s <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_chip" rel="nofollow">1993 all over again.</a></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Privacy no longer can mean anonymity&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Wow, talk about your NewSpeak.</p>
<p>RE:telecom companies immunity</p>
<p>Threat Level has been covering this extensively. There are some <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/wired27b/~3/173656283/senator-denies-.html" rel="nofollow">eye opening graphs here</a>. There&#8217;s some coverage of <a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/11/att-whistle-blo.html" rel="nofollow">Mark Klein and his insight on how throughly the FedGoonz</a> are scraping teh web of &#8216;net, looking for the terrorists, and monitoring those who would protest against <a href="http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2006/01/27/protecting_honey_baked_ham_from_terrorists/" rel="nofollow">honey-baked hams</a></p>
<p>Lean Left covers the &#8220;<a href="http://www.leanleft.com/archives/2007/11/06/6330/" rel="nofollow">immunity for telco corporate-personhood thingys</a>&#8221; and manages not to say &#8220;Democrats&#8221;, (To be fair, there also isn&#8217;t a reference to Republicans either).</p>
<p>Telco Immunity is something we can&#8217;t just let slide by. with broad based bipartisan congress-critter support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
