You forgot to mention the large support Ron Paul gets from Werewolves, Zombies, and Peter pan’s kids too when listing the “majority of supporters”, surely you know better than to contruct a conspiracy and not include these entities.

ronpaul2008.com doesn’t get large support, period. He polls at a consistent 1-3% once you get into a real survey and not a floodable online poll. He got an impressive amount of money from nutcases on one day. It still wasn’t enough money to put him into contention on fundraising with any of the front runners.

And of course I am part of some conspiracy to create a conspiracy theory because I’m a whacky conspiracy theorist.

He may be the “better than everyone else” candidate, but that says a lot, given the choices.

I read up on Fred! when his name first surfaced and moved from Rudy to Fred!. So I’ve flipped – or flopped – can’t keep track. And I don’t even wear flipFlops – I wear track shoes…. heh.

However, I noticed that he stated that his intention was to campaign towards the people who agreed with his principles and supported his principles. He has stated that he is not pursuing the PoTUS because he is enamored with the job – but because he feels it is a job that he needs to do. And – to a certain extent – it shows in his (begrudgingly acknowledged) lack of passion on the stump.

(I got $5 that says Blount posts a response here within 5 minutes….)
(I got another $5 that his response says Ron is better….)

BT

That, and I think there is a feeling that Paul isn’t really going to pull out of Iraq immediately when pretty much the entire military leadership advise otherwise. I suspect it would be a more gradual thing anyway; which is exactly how things are playing out with the greatly successful surge strategy.

Just my $0.02.

-A

You forgot to mention the large support Ron Paul gets from Werewolves, Zombies, and Peter pan’s kids too when listing the “majority of supporters”, surely you know better than to contruct a conspiracy and not include these entities.
I also want to remind you that the anti-war crowd happens to represent 70% (estimated) of the country. So in future fabrications you may want to spin this large majority into some type of alien worshiping pig fornicating Nazi’s that think that Dick Cheney planted a nuke at ground zero and love illegal aliens that kill our children while bowing down to the Evil Dr. Paul with lazer beams on their heads. Only trying to help out.

Nah, really I think the point you were trying to make is false and absurd.

It’s also too bad that Fred Thompson, who on Federalism (where I do agree with the learned doctor) is closer to Paul’s position than any of the others, hasn’t found a way to connect with some of those voters/donors.

There’s an underlying flaw to that reasoning. The majority of the interwebs ronpaul2008.com supporters don’t support him because of his federalist views. They support his anti-war and truther-friendly views.

He isn’t being supported by conservatives. He is being supported by liberals and socialists who can’t find any ant-war and truther support on either side of the aisle.

It is so right to note that the $4Million given to Ron Paul yesterday is because we want that message to get out and we might even consider going with Fred Thompson if he could get half the personality of Ron Paul and half the interest in talking about individual rights.

And, since 25% of Republican women want to vote for Hillary and 25% of Democrat males refuse to vote for her…the smart candidate will take on Men’s Rights Issues and even Father’s Rights Issues and run with that ball.

Just do a Google search for those issues. If a mainstream candidate picked up on that, he would get stratospheric results and defuse Ron Paul’s luster.