Comments on: It’s not the crime it’s the cover up http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/07/27/its_not_the_crime_its_the_cover_up/ Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you. Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:28:54 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Cactus Jack http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/07/27/its_not_the_crime_its_the_cover_up/comment-page-1/#comment-177200 Cactus Jack Sat, 28 Jul 2007 02:47:22 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/07/27/its_not_the_crime_its_the_cover_up/#comment-177200 "So was CNN incredibly ignorant and gullible here, or was it deliberately passing along anti-gun propaganda that it knew to be false?" My vote goes to the latter though I have no doubt that they're idiots. I would'nt believe CNN if they said water was wet, I'd check it out myself. “So was CNN incredibly ignorant and gullible here, or was it deliberately passing along anti-gun propaganda that it knew to be false?”

My vote goes to the latter though I have no doubt that they’re idiots. I would’nt believe CNN if they said water was wet, I’d check it out myself.

]]> By: straightarrow http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/07/27/its_not_the_crime_its_the_cover_up/comment-page-1/#comment-177173 straightarrow Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:13:30 +0000 http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/07/27/its_not_the_crime_its_the_cover_up/#comment-177173 Left this at WoG, with your permission will post it here also. "Perhaps this would be a good time to point out his unintended admission/confession? If we are "second amendment literalists" as he says, that means not only do we know what the second amendment literally means, but so does he. Ergo, he has confessed to condoning the denial of rights to the free American citizen and thus eliminating freedom. For if literal interpretation of the Constitution is to be ignored, then there are no rules for anybody. No law means anything more or less than the person or persons wishing it different from its literal meaning. Laws against murder should not be taken literally, his right to publish or express an opinion should not be taken literally, his right to presumption of innocence if accused of a crime should not be taken literally, nor should his right to a quick, speedy trial by a jury of his peers. This stupid sonofabitch doesn't even know he just exposed exposed himself, LITERALLY." Left this at WoG, with your permission will post it here also.

“Perhaps this would be a good time to point out his unintended admission/confession?

If we are “second amendment literalists” as he says, that means not only do we know what the second amendment literally means, but so does he.

Ergo, he has confessed to condoning the denial of rights to the free American citizen and thus eliminating freedom. For if literal interpretation of the Constitution is to be ignored, then there are no rules for anybody. No law means anything more or less than the person or persons wishing it different from its literal meaning.

Laws against murder should not be taken literally, his right to publish or express an opinion should not be taken literally, his right to presumption of innocence if accused of a crime should not be taken literally, nor should his right to a quick, speedy trial by a jury of his peers.

This stupid sonofabitch doesn’t even know he just exposed exposed himself, LITERALLY.”

]]>