<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What would Patton say?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/07/24/what_would_patton_say/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/07/24/what_would_patton_say/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:33:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stormy Dragon</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/07/24/what_would_patton_say/comment-page-1/#comment-177043</link>
		<dc:creator>Stormy Dragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/07/24/what_would_patton_say/#comment-177043</guid>
		<description>This video is yet another example of why I&#039;ve pretty much stopped voting Republican: the complete moral rot that has infected the philsophical core of conservatism in this country has left the party incapable of defending its actions on any rational basis, so the party is resorting to the most blatant appeals to emotion, to the point that (as in this case) of being delusional.

The fact that the Republican electorate gladly laps this up is sickening.

What exactly is this video supposed to convince me of? How does the fact some schlub can digitally edit footage of George C. Scott playing Patton to make it appear as though Patton is saying something he never said make said schlub&#039;s argument any more compelling than if he&#039;d presented it himself?

The implication I&#039;m supposed to find this clip especially persuasive is an insult to my intelligence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This video is yet another example of why I&#8217;ve pretty much stopped voting Republican: the complete moral rot that has infected the philsophical core of conservatism in this country has left the party incapable of defending its actions on any rational basis, so the party is resorting to the most blatant appeals to emotion, to the point that (as in this case) of being delusional.</p>
<p>The fact that the Republican electorate gladly laps this up is sickening.</p>
<p>What exactly is this video supposed to convince me of? How does the fact some schlub can digitally edit footage of George C. Scott playing Patton to make it appear as though Patton is saying something he never said make said schlub&#8217;s argument any more compelling than if he&#8217;d presented it himself?</p>
<p>The implication I&#8217;m supposed to find this clip especially persuasive is an insult to my intelligence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Metulj</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/07/24/what_would_patton_say/comment-page-1/#comment-176918</link>
		<dc:creator>Metulj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/07/24/what_would_patton_say/#comment-176918</guid>
		<description>Remember, she knows where the WMDs are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember, she knows where the WMDs are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
