<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ballistics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/06/26/ballistics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/06/26/ballistics/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:17:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justthisguy</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/06/26/ballistics/comment-page-1/#comment-174447</link>
		<dc:creator>Justthisguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 01:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/06/26/ballistics/#comment-174447</guid>
		<description>I was trying to be a bit facetious, there.  I do still hold that the thicker you are, the more likelihood of a military FMJ bullet losing stability and tumbling in your thick greasy body.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was trying to be a bit facetious, there.  I do still hold that the thicker you are, the more likelihood of a military FMJ bullet losing stability and tumbling in your thick greasy body.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyle</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/06/26/ballistics/comment-page-1/#comment-174444</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/06/26/ballistics/#comment-174444</guid>
		<description>Well, different bullets perform very differently, and mass and velocity, in addition to bullet design, make for some very dramatic differences.

They could have used a real rifle with real, lead bullets, and gotten wildly different results from even the same cartridge.

Justthisguy: Here&#039;s a good example of matching bullet the design to the desired terminal effect, from that same .223 rifle, but with light-jacket, hollowpoint bullets at high velocity (probably in the high 3000s fps):
http://www.dogbegone.com/video.htm

Your typical hunting bullet (heavy softpoint) launched from a .300 magnum, is going to go right though your vest, do a lot of major damage, and exit the other side at high speed.  A little .32 automatic pistol, launching a 60 grain hollowpoint, may very well be stopped by a big layer of fat.  I can tell you from experience that a .32 Auto full metal jacket bullet (best for penetration) fired from a few inches away, did not make it through the thin 1.5&quot; of a standard, fir 2 x 4 stud board.  (that&#039;s when I traded it for a .45)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, different bullets perform very differently, and mass and velocity, in addition to bullet design, make for some very dramatic differences.</p>
<p>They could have used a real rifle with real, lead bullets, and gotten wildly different results from even the same cartridge.</p>
<p>Justthisguy: Here&#8217;s a good example of matching bullet the design to the desired terminal effect, from that same .223 rifle, but with light-jacket, hollowpoint bullets at high velocity (probably in the high 3000s fps):<br />
<a href="http://www.dogbegone.com/video.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.dogbegone.com/video.htm</a></p>
<p>Your typical hunting bullet (heavy softpoint) launched from a .300 magnum, is going to go right though your vest, do a lot of major damage, and exit the other side at high speed.  A little .32 automatic pistol, launching a 60 grain hollowpoint, may very well be stopped by a big layer of fat.  I can tell you from experience that a .32 Auto full metal jacket bullet (best for penetration) fired from a few inches away, did not make it through the thin 1.5&#8243; of a standard, fir 2 x 4 stud board.  (that&#8217;s when I traded it for a .45)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justthisguy</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/06/26/ballistics/comment-page-1/#comment-174435</link>
		<dc:creator>Justthisguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2007 21:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/06/26/ballistics/#comment-174435</guid>
		<description>It ain&#039;t stopping it that&#039;s important.  What&#039;s more important is how far the bullet goes into you before it starts to tumble. As one of &quot;we slender, nervous people&quot; (to quote Barney Fife)  I&#039;m happy to report that a 5.56 projectile would be in and out before it started to tumble and fragment, presuming I stand up squarely and take it like a man.  Sorta like an armor-piercing shell going through a destroyer without detonating until afterwards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It ain&#8217;t stopping it that&#8217;s important.  What&#8217;s more important is how far the bullet goes into you before it starts to tumble. As one of &#8220;we slender, nervous people&#8221; (to quote Barney Fife)  I&#8217;m happy to report that a 5.56 projectile would be in and out before it started to tumble and fragment, presuming I stand up squarely and take it like a man.  Sorta like an armor-piercing shell going through a destroyer without detonating until afterwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

