<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s not a bug, it&#8217;s a feature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/06/07/its_not_a_bug_its_a_feature-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/06/07/its_not_a_bug_its_a_feature-2/</link>
	<description>Remember, I do this to entertain me... not you.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:09:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: #9</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/06/07/its_not_a_bug_its_a_feature-2/comment-page-1/#comment-173528</link>
		<dc:creator>#9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 17:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/06/07/its_not_a_bug_its_a_feature-2/#comment-173528</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Sometimes I think we need a third legislative chamber. One solely dedicated to striking obsolete and unconstitutional laws from the books.&lt;/i&gt;

I think the Congress is charged with that already. Let&#039;s face it, they do not do their job and we allow it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Sometimes I think we need a third legislative chamber. One solely dedicated to striking obsolete and unconstitutional laws from the books.</i></p>
<p>I think the Congress is charged with that already. Let&#8217;s face it, they do not do their job and we allow it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/06/07/its_not_a_bug_its_a_feature-2/comment-page-1/#comment-173443</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 05:06:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/06/07/its_not_a_bug_its_a_feature-2/#comment-173443</guid>
		<description>Repeal the 17th Amendment.  That ought to help with the grid lock, i.e., increase it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Repeal the 17th Amendment.  That ought to help with the grid lock, i.e., increase it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: straightarrow</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/06/07/its_not_a_bug_its_a_feature-2/comment-page-1/#comment-173431</link>
		<dc:creator>straightarrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 04:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/06/07/its_not_a_bug_its_a_feature-2/#comment-173431</guid>
		<description>Uncle is &lt;strong&gt;absofuckinglutely &lt;/strong&gt;right.  Nebraska has a unicameral legislature. Go look at the absurd horseshit they do without argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uncle is <strong>absofuckinglutely </strong>right.  Nebraska has a unicameral legislature. Go look at the absurd horseshit they do without argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Standard Mischief</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/06/07/its_not_a_bug_its_a_feature-2/comment-page-1/#comment-173425</link>
		<dc:creator>Standard Mischief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2007 02:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/06/07/its_not_a_bug_its_a_feature-2/#comment-173425</guid>
		<description>Sometimes I think we need a third legislative chamber. One solely dedicated to striking obsolete and unconstitutional  laws from the books.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes I think we need a third legislative chamber. One solely dedicated to striking obsolete and unconstitutional  laws from the books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyle</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/06/07/its_not_a_bug_its_a_feature-2/comment-page-1/#comment-173422</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 21:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/06/07/its_not_a_bug_its_a_feature-2/#comment-173422</guid>
		<description>I think someone skipped out on their U.S. government classes back in jr. high school.

Next, we&#039;ll be hearing calls for a single decision maker, elected by popular vote, so as to avoid all indecision and conflict.  This is also known as a &quot;dictator&quot;, but why discount something just because it has a bad-sounding name?  For that matter, why bother with elections?  Once we have a smart guy in office (and what could be smarter than someone elected by popular vote?) we can turn over total power to him and keep him there for life.  We can call him &quot;chancellor&quot;, we&#039;ll swear an oath of allegiance to him personally, and we&#039;ll end up with a &quot;thousand year empire&quot; of glorious proportions.  What could be more effective than that?

Actually, Congressional &quot;gridlock&quot; is a good thing, boys and girls.  It means:
A short period in which our freedom isn&#039;t being chipped away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think someone skipped out on their U.S. government classes back in jr. high school.</p>
<p>Next, we&#8217;ll be hearing calls for a single decision maker, elected by popular vote, so as to avoid all indecision and conflict.  This is also known as a &#8220;dictator&#8221;, but why discount something just because it has a bad-sounding name?  For that matter, why bother with elections?  Once we have a smart guy in office (and what could be smarter than someone elected by popular vote?) we can turn over total power to him and keep him there for life.  We can call him &#8220;chancellor&#8221;, we&#8217;ll swear an oath of allegiance to him personally, and we&#8217;ll end up with a &#8220;thousand year empire&#8221; of glorious proportions.  What could be more effective than that?</p>
<p>Actually, Congressional &#8220;gridlock&#8221; is a good thing, boys and girls.  It means:<br />
A short period in which our freedom isn&#8217;t being chipped away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/06/07/its_not_a_bug_its_a_feature-2/comment-page-1/#comment-173397</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 16:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/06/07/its_not_a_bug_its_a_feature-2/#comment-173397</guid>
		<description>In short: An efficient government is the _last_ thing we need...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In short: An efficient government is the _last_ thing we need&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: #9</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/06/07/its_not_a_bug_its_a_feature-2/comment-page-1/#comment-173392</link>
		<dc:creator>#9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 16:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/06/07/its_not_a_bug_its_a_feature-2/#comment-173392</guid>
		<description>Two things, the &quot;Au contraire, mon cracker&quot; is priceless and I will be borrowing that. Future hat tips.

Second, what is ACK smoking? Not even Ron Paul would suggest something this far out.

When ACK writes, &quot;I understand we have to have a legislature but do we need two separate bodies&quot; what is he thinking? One unicameral legislature my ass. That is crazy talk. On a Constitutional basis ACK is out in far left field. And I do mean left field. First the soldier thing and now this. What happened?

What next, we don&#039;t need no stinking Electoral College ACK?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things, the &#8220;Au contraire, mon cracker&#8221; is priceless and I will be borrowing that. Future hat tips.</p>
<p>Second, what is ACK smoking? Not even Ron Paul would suggest something this far out.</p>
<p>When ACK writes, &#8220;I understand we have to have a legislature but do we need two separate bodies&#8221; what is he thinking? One unicameral legislature my ass. That is crazy talk. On a Constitutional basis ACK is out in far left field. And I do mean left field. First the soldier thing and now this. What happened?</p>
<p>What next, we don&#8217;t need no stinking Electoral College ACK?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Volunteer Voters &#187; This Ain&#8217;t 1796</title>
		<link>http://www.saysuncle.com/2007/06/07/its_not_a_bug_its_a_feature-2/comment-page-1/#comment-173390</link>
		<dc:creator>Volunteer Voters &#187; This Ain&#8217;t 1796</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 16:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.saysuncle.com/archives/2007/06/07/its_not_a_bug_its_a_feature-2/#comment-173390</guid>
		<description>[...] My Uncle Say busts out with some instant contrarian analysis to my call for a unicameral legislature one half hour ago: Au contraire, mon cracker. This is one case in which the Leviathan gets my support. I like when there’s a pissing match between them. It keeps them from doing really stupid stuff. When a large group of politicians agree on something, it’s probably bad for me and you. Hell, I think six houses would be good. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My Uncle Say busts out with some instant contrarian analysis to my call for a unicameral legislature one half hour ago: Au contraire, mon cracker. This is one case in which the Leviathan gets my support. I like when there’s a pissing match between them. It keeps them from doing really stupid stuff. When a large group of politicians agree on something, it’s probably bad for me and you. Hell, I think six houses would be good. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
