“Two Rino’s and two Dino’s, four globalists.”

You’ve nailed it, #9!

And the controlled political-media elite establishment will assure that our two major party candidates will be qualified accordingly:

On May 4, 1993, Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) president Leslie Gelb said on The Charlie Rose Show that:
“…you [Charlie Rose] had me on [before] to talk about the New World Order! I talk about it all the time. It’s one world now. The Council [CFR] can FIND, NURTURE, and begin to PUT PEOPLE in the kinds of jobs this country needs. And that’s going to be one of the major enterprises of the Council under me.”

So true. In fact it wouldn’t surprise me in the least in any of those four gave Bill Clinton a high level appointment.

Two Rino’s and two Dino’s, four globalists.

They all have the same motto, “Say Anything”.

Let’s think…Republicans vote whatever single-issue they’re dedicated to, or they vote their “principals,” in protest against an impure candidate, or they “sit it out” to teach their party a lesson. I think that’s pretty much how it’s been going for a while, right? That’s how it went in ‘92 and (for many) in ‘06.

Libertarians won’t like Bloomberg, because he’s way too much of a Nanny-state Nurse.

Democrats vote for Democrats. Or Reagan. And a lot of them would vote for Giuliani. That’s about it.

Perhaps Bloomberg is thinking he’ll be the spoiler that simply helps to further divide and conquer all the “non-Democrat” factions. I don’t see how his candidacy would be anything but a boon to the Democrat nominee.

Hmmmmm. Just imagine:
President Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Vice-President Barack Obama.
First Gentleman & Amb.-to-the-World Bill Clinton.
Attorney General Sandy Berger.
Supreme Court Justice Jamie Gorelick.
Supreme Court Justice Marian Wright Edelman.
Supreme Court Justice George Stephanopolis.
Supreme Court Justice Ira Magaziner.
National Security Advisor Harold Ickes.
SecState Oprah Winfrey.
Energy Tzar Al Gore (undersecretary Laurie David).
SecTreasury George Soros, or Jeff Epstein…or Mike Bloomberg
SecDef John McCain.
HUDSec Rosie O’ Donnell
SecEd Ben Affleck.
All confirmed with nary a whimper outta congress, as noted by White House Press Secretary Katie Couric.

As I said in my previous post: America does not need another rich guy who is clueless about the government running for president.

Gays can marry? Fine. Abortion? OK. But what’s up with the gun control, then? And why can’t an adult smoke a cigarette in a bar? The man is a loon.

With money.

But if Bloomer is seriously going to run, his God complex is going to get hit with a dose of reality. But I really would like to know what libs. think of Bloomers. He could be the new Nader.

However, what makes Bloomberg a “moderate?” Exactly what of his various positions is conservative?

***The bicycler thing is pretty humourous, though. Michael Savage had a funny row about it a few weeks back. But some of them are real jerks, especially around large University settings.

If anything, Bloomberg would appeal much more to leftists or “liberals” rather than conservatives as did Perot. His candidacy would help IF, IF the Republicans nominate a true conservative like Tom Tancredo or Duncan Hunter…and somewaht less so, Fred Thompson, who supported the leftist Campaign Finance Reform attack on the First Amendment and had a weak voting record on immigration issues.

Rudy’s snakeoiling us into thinking he’s anything but an authortarian.

I don’t see him as enough of a draw that he can win. But he sure could take down Rudy Giuliani and put Hillary in the Oval Office. I don’t see Bloomberg hurting Fred Thompson.

From the Washington Times:

“A third-party candidacy is almost inevitable” in 2008, said former Virginia Democratic Party Chairman Paul Goldman, who pointed out that third-party candidacies have affected the outcome of five of the past 10 presidential elections — including George Wallace in 1968, John Anderson in 1980, Mr. Perot in 1992 and ‘96, and Green Party candidate Ralph Nader in 2000.”

“If the Republicans nominate someone the press can tag as a pro-war social conservative and the Democrats pick an anti-war liberal, Bloomberg will run up the center,” Mr. Goldman said. “If conservatives don’t rally to stop Giuliani they will get a third party socially conservative candidate who will only help elect the Democrat.”

Listening to Bloomie reminds me of Orwell, WAR IS PEACE, IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH, etc….

It’s just a rhetorical description. Lighten up, I don’t want to take away your bike. You want to ride your bike on the street, have a good time.

But watch out for Bloomberg, he may have different ideas. Super nanny may disapprove.

What will his slogan be? “More nannyish than both major parties put together?”

You really need to get over your phobia of bicyclists.