Comments on: SayUncle: Potential Terrorist

By: SayUncle » SayUncle: Potential Terrorist

SayUncle » SayUncle: Potential Terrorist — Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:13:15 +0000

[...] after the first couple of times, you get used to [...]

By: SayUncle » SayUncle: Potential Terrorist - 2

SayUncle » SayUncle: Potential Terrorist - 2 — Tue, 15 May 2007 12:07:39 +0000

[...] In Pennsylvania this time. Background here. [...]

By: Target Rich Environment » Blog Archive » PA State Government: Libertarians and Like-Minded are Terrorists

Mon, 14 May 2007 21:20:39 +0000

[...] Random Nukular Strikes (here), good post, read the whole thing. I got redirected from a link (here) to SayUncle, where the state of Alabama defined his political beliefs as terroristic. Well, I [...]

By: SayUncle » More on Lautenberg’s bill to deny due process

SayUncle » More on Lautenberg’s bill to deny due process — Mon, 14 May 2007 12:38:29 +0000

[...] known terrorists, shouldn’t they be in jail? If they’re suspected terrorists (and who isn’t?), I’m afraid we have this thing called due process of law and we can’t just go [...]

By: Volunteer Voters » Headlines And Hyperlinks

Volunteer Voters » Headlines And Hyperlinks — Fri, 11 May 2007 22:44:12 +0000

[...] SayUncle: Potential Terrorist [...]

By: Chris Byrne

Chris Byrne — Fri, 11 May 2007 21:55:15 +0000

Heh… I wonder what they’d think of this

Perhaps this is a radical proposition…

By: #9

#9 — Fri, 11 May 2007 18:13:28 +0000

You need to see this. When government officials that are sworn to protect the U.S. Constitution use belief in the Constitution as a profiling technique we need to take a serious look at their employment.

By: straightarrow

straightarrow — Fri, 11 May 2007 18:06:00 +0000

Robert nailed the oath they actually observe.

These people know we are not terrorists, they also know the majority are ignorant of the issue and will accept their word for it that by tightening the bands of domestic tyranny they are being secured. Never realizing that they actually are being secured, just like a prisoner or a slave is secured.

By: Gringo_Malo

Gringo_Malo — Fri, 11 May 2007 16:21:10 +0000

“It is sobering to reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the struggle for independence.” — Charles A. Beard

BTW, the line about defenders of the Constitution is from the FBI, so you’re screwed whatever you’re in.

By: Robert

Robert — Fri, 11 May 2007 15:23:20 +0000

I do with the LEOs and FBI would update the oath they take when they are sworn in. It might go something like: I do swear and affirm that I will protect and defend the status quo, my agency, my boss and my paycheck and pension against anyone who threatens them, even if they don’t and it’s just the boss doing a political favor.
I further promise to follow all orders from above, period, no takebacks and no questions.

By: Rivrdog

Rivrdog — Fri, 11 May 2007 15:05:10 +0000

This current kerfluffle over the “thought police” may have the (intended, un-intended, you pick) consequence of starting the actual fight to protect the Constitution even sooner than previously surmised.

This has the sound of a (D)onk campaign platform initiative that would go like this:

“The Democratic Party is much more concerned with fighting terrorists than the GOP. As proof, just look at the number of people who are armed and have said that under certain circumstances which THEY choose, they would begin hostilities against their government, even if YOU were in the way of their bullets. This number has risen sharply during the Bush administration. We, the Democratic Party, recognize that these people are a greater threat to our security than most of the Islamic fighters which Bush has been persecuting during his war, so Those People are the ones we seek to keep and eye on and especially, disarm.”

I could see some for of that statement in the (D)onk platform next year. I could see some legislation based on it being signed by a new (d)onk POTUS.

I could see us having the choice of fighting to end this attack on the culture and the Constitution, or rolling over, giving away all our guns, and stepping up to the Kool-Aid bar.

By: Sailorcurt

Sailorcurt — Fri, 11 May 2007 15:03:57 +0000

The biggest issue is that, once they have defined us as terrorists, they can put us on terrorist watch lists.

I seem to remember something about the terrorist watch list being added to “prohibited persons”.

See a trend here?

Next step would be midnight “no knock” raids by the ATF.

It pains me to say this but the truth of it is just becoming too strong to deny: The war’s coming. It’s just a matter of time.

By: #9

#9 — Fri, 11 May 2007 14:37:16 +0000

Defenders of the U.S. Constitution

Damn. I would be screwed if I lived in Alabama. That is one of the last places I would think this could happen.

By: Red

Red — Fri, 11 May 2007 13:57:26 +0000

Defenders of the U.S. Constitution

That is quite possibly one of the scariest things I have ever read.